ΑΙhub.org
 

ICML 2020 Test of Time award


by
13 July 2020



share this:

ICML
The International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) Test of Time award is given to a paper from ICML ten years ago that has had significant impact. This year the award goes to Niranjan Srinivas, Andreas Krause, Sham Kakade and Matthias Seeger for their work “Gaussian Process Optimization in the Bandit Setting: No Regret and Experimental Design“.

The award was announced by the conference chairs on 1 July:

On their award page the ICML Test of Time Award committee members explain the significance of the paper:

This paper brought together the fields of Bayesian optimization, bandits and experimental design by analyzing Gaussian process bandit optimization, giving a novel approach to derive finite-sample regret bounds in terms of a mutual information gain quantity. This paper has had profound impact over the past ten years, including the method itself, the proof techniques used, and the practical results. These have all enriched our community by sparking creativity in myriad subsequent works, ranging from theory to practice.

The authors react to the good news:

In a special award session the authors gave a plenary talk describing their work. To summarise their presentation they took a brief look back over the ten years following publication of their paper and noted that the community have been working on a number of exciting related topics during that time. These areas include:
Theory of Bayesian optimisation and kernalized bandits – exploring other acquisition functions and high dimensions, developing fast algorithms, and establishing lower bounds.
Variants of Bayesian optimisation and kernalized bandits – a lot of this research is motivated by various practical applications. For example, in experimental design settings you might want to schedule experiments to happen in parallel or in batches, you might want to trade-off multiple objectives or take constraints into account (motivated by safety and robustness considerations).
More general models – analysis tools similar to the one reported in this paper have found exciting applications. These include neural bandits and neural tangent kernel, Thompson sampling and reinforcement learning.

In addition to these theoretical developments, there has been a lot of exciting work on applications of GP-UCB and Bayesian optimisation more broadly. Bayesian optimisation is now used extensively in industry for problems related to automatic machine learning, robotics, recommender systems, environmental monitoring, protein design, and much more.

Read the winning paper

The abstract on arXiv.
The full paper as pdf.



tags: ,


Lucy Smith is Senior Managing Editor for AIhub.
Lucy Smith is Senior Managing Editor for AIhub.

            AUAI is supported by:



Subscribe to AIhub newsletter on substack



Related posts :

monthly digest

AIhub monthly digest: October 2026 – neurosymbolic planning, time-series forecasting, and robots for the home

  30 Oct 2026
Welcome to our monthly digest, where you can catch up with AI research, events and news from the month past.
AI pioneers

From teaching machines to teaching people: an interview with Michael Littman

  29 Oct 2026
AI Pioneer Michael Littman reflects on the evolution of reinforcement learning, the power of science communication, and how generative AI is changing the way we teach and learn.

From lab to life: Why translating AI advances to the real world is a major challenge

  28 Oct 2026
Systems that perform well in controlled lab settings often fall short when deployed in homes, in hospitals or on city streets.

Researchers get AI ‘drunk’ to expose new cyber security risks in chatbots

Fine-tuning large language models using drunken text makes them more likely to leak secrets and answer harmful questions.

AI is creating jobs as well as erasing them – but how rewarding are they?

  26 Oct 2026
One area of increased employment is in people “cleaning up” after LLMs, or quality controlling them.

How AI changes human decision-making

  23 Oct 2026
AI can identify patterns that people miss and bring new information into decision-making. However, this does not automatically lead to better decisions.

Competing in RoboCup@Home and winning the 2026 best paper award: an interview with Raphael Memmesheimer

  22 Oct 2026
Hear more about Raphael's research and his involvement in the RoboCup@Home league.

AI is distorting archaeology and flattening Indigenous Knowledge

While AI can help archaeologists, it can also spread pseudoscientific claims and false histories, stripping Indigenous Knowledge of context, consent and community control.


↑


AUAI is supported by:







Subscribe to AIhub newsletter on substack




 















©2026.05 - Association for the Understanding of Artificial Intelligence