ΑΙhub.org
 

#ICML2022 Test of Time award announced


by
20 July 2022



share this:
winners' medal

The International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) Test of Time award is given to a paper from ICML ten years ago that has had significant impact. This year the award goes to:

Poisoning Attacks against Support Vector Machines
Battista Biggio, Blaine Nelson and Pavel Laskov

The paper investigates adversarial machine learning and, specifically, poisoning attacks on support vector machines (SVMs). The awards committee noted that this paper is one of the earliest and most impactful papers on the theme of poisoning attacks, which are now widely studied by the community. The authors use a gradient ascent strategy in which the gradient is computed based on properties of the SVM’s optimal solution. The method can be kernelized, thereby not needing explicit feature representation. The committee judged that this paper initiated thorough investigation of the problem and inspired significant subsequent work.

The abstract of the paper:
We investigate a family of poisoning attacks against Support Vector Machines (SVM). Such attacks inject specially crafted training data that increases the SVM’s test error. Central to the motivation for these attacks is the fact that most learning algorithms assume that their training data comes from a natural or well-behaved distribution. However, this assumption does not generally hold in security-sensitive settings. As we demonstrate, an intelligent adversary can, to some extent, predict the change of the SVM’s decision function due to malicious input and use this ability to construct malicious data. The proposed attack uses a gradient ascent strategy in which the gradient is computed based on properties of the SVM’s optimal solution. This method can be kernelized and enables the attack to be constructed in the input space even for non-linear kernels. We experimentally demonstrate that our gradient ascent procedure reliably identifies good local maxima of the non-convex validation error surface, which significantly increases the classifier’s test error.

You can read the paper in full here.

In a special award session, first author Battista Biggio gave a plenary talk describing the research, and subsequent developments. In the early days of this research field (around 2006-2010) work on poisoning attacks focussed on simple models and concerned security-related applications, such as spam filtering and network intrusion detection. The challenge that the authors set themselves with this work was to find out if these attacks were possible against a more complex classifier, and something closer to the state-of-the-art. They decided to study SVMs because they were theoretically grounded and quite popular at the time. Their strategy was to find an optimal attack point (to inject the “poisoned” samples) that maximised the classification error.

Battista also spoke about some of the work that has followed in this space, including adversarial examples for deep neural networks, machine learning security, and different types of attacks against machine learning models.

You can watch Battista’s original talk on this paper, at ICML 2012.

There were also two Test of Time honourable mentions:

  • Building high-level features using large scale unsupervised learning
    Quoc Le, Marc’Aurelio Ranzato, Rajat Monga, Matthieu Devin, Kai Chen, Greg Corrado, Jeff Dean, Andrew Ng
    Read the paper here.
  • On causal and anticausal learning
    Bernhard Schölkopf, Dominik Janzing, Jonas Peters, Eleni Sgouritsa, Kun Zhang, Joris Mooij
    Read the paper here.


tags: ,


Lucy Smith is Senior Managing Editor for AIhub.
Lucy Smith is Senior Managing Editor for AIhub.

            AUAI is supported by:



Subscribe to AIhub newsletter on substack



Related posts :

AI100 longitudinal study examines how AI has entered the mainstream

  10 Nov 2026
Published every five years, the report is compiled by experts in the field.
AI pioneers

Thinking big – from constraint programming to the Holy Grail: an interview with Gene Freuder

  10 Nov 2026
In our latest instalment of AI Pioneers, we speak to Gene Freuder on the field of constraint programming, neurosymbolic and generative AI approaches in AI, and the bigger picture of computer science.

How attackers persuade AI agents to break the rules

  09 Nov 2026
As AI assistants evolve into AI agents, a study has found that the biggest safety risks in their use may not come from single malicious prompts, but from carefully orchestrated conversations.

Interview with Minji Park: humans in the loop to keep language models up to date

  06 Nov 2026
Human-AI co-inference through a shared editable state.

AI plus chemistry can expand battery electrolyte design

  05 Nov 2026
Researchers are using artificial intelligence to speed the search for better battery materials.
coffee corner

AIhub coffee corner: Are humanoids the future of embodied AI?

  04 Nov 2026
The AIhub coffee corner captures the musings of AI experts over a short conversation.

“With AI, we need to reconsider what it means to learn”

  03 Nov 2026
Artificial intelligence is forcing universities to reinvent how they teach and assess students’ knowledge.

Forthcoming machine learning and AI seminars: November 2026 edition

  02 Nov 2026
A list of free-to-attend AI-related seminars that are scheduled to take place in the next couple of months.


↑


AUAI is supported by:







Subscribe to AIhub newsletter on substack




 















©2026.05 - Association for the Understanding of Artificial Intelligence