ΑΙhub.org
 

AI transparency in practice: a report

by
22 March 2023



share this:

Abstract microscopic photography of a Graphics Processing Unit resembling a satellite image of a big cityFritzchens Fritz / Better Images of AI / GPU shot etched 5 / Licenced by CC-BY 4.0

A report, co-authored by Ramak Molavi Vasse’i (Mozilla’s Insights Team) and Jesse McCrosky (Thoughtworks), investigates the issue of AI transparency. The pair dig into what AI transparency actually means, and aim to provide useful and actionable information for specific stakeholders. The report also details a survey of current approaches, assesses their limitations, and outlines how meaningful transparency might be achieved.

The authors have highlighted the following key findings from their report:

  • The focus of builders is primarily on system accuracy and debugging, rather than helping end users and impacted people understand algorithmic decisions.
  • AI transparency is rarely prioritized by the leadership of respondents’ organizations, partly due to a lack of pressure to comply with the legislation.
  • While there is active research around AI explainability (XAI) tools, there are fewer examples of effective deployment and use of such tools, and little confidence in their effectiveness.
  • Apart from information on data bias, there is little work on sharing information on system design, metrics, or wider impacts on individuals and society. Builders generally do not employ criteria established for social and environmental transparency, nor do they consider unintended consequences.
  • Providing appropriate explanations to various stakeholders poses a challenge for developers. There is a noticeable discrepancy between the information survey respondents currently provide and the information they would find useful and recommend.

Topics covered in the report include:

  • Meaningful AI transparency
  • Transparency stakeholders and their needs
  • Motivations and priorities of builders around AI transparency
  • Transparency tools and methods
  • Awareness of social and ecological impact
  • Transparency delivery – practices and recommendations
  • Ranking challenges for greater AI transparency

You can read the report in full here. A PDF version is here.




Lucy Smith , Managing Editor for AIhub.
Lucy Smith , Managing Editor for AIhub.




            AIhub is supported by:


Related posts :



What’s on the programme at #ECAI2024?

Find out what the 27th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence has in store.
17 October 2024, by

What is “best practice” when working with AI in the real world?

Anna Demming speaks to a panel of experts about how to meet “best practice” aspirations within real world constraints, and how to avoid common pitfalls.
16 October 2024, by

ICRA@40 mini interviews from RockingRobots

Hear from some of the participants at the special 40th anniversary ICRA event.
15 October 2024, by

What’s coming up at #IROS2024?

The International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) will take place from 14-18 October.
11 October 2024, by

Nobel Prizes in physics and chemistry awarded for machine learning research

Prizes given for work enabling and using deep learning methods.
10 October 2024, by

An introduction to science communication at #IROS2024

Find out more about our course, in collaboration with IEEE Spectrum, to be held at IROS on Tuesday 15 October.
09 October 2024, by




AIhub is supported by:






©2024 - Association for the Understanding of Artificial Intelligence


 












©2021 - ROBOTS Association