ΑΙhub.org
 

AI transparency in practice: a report


by
22 March 2023



share this:

Abstract microscopic photography of a Graphics Processing Unit resembling a satellite image of a big cityFritzchens Fritz / Better Images of AI / GPU shot etched 5 / Licenced by CC-BY 4.0

A report, co-authored by Ramak Molavi Vasse’i (Mozilla’s Insights Team) and Jesse McCrosky (Thoughtworks), investigates the issue of AI transparency. The pair dig into what AI transparency actually means, and aim to provide useful and actionable information for specific stakeholders. The report also details a survey of current approaches, assesses their limitations, and outlines how meaningful transparency might be achieved.

The authors have highlighted the following key findings from their report:

  • The focus of builders is primarily on system accuracy and debugging, rather than helping end users and impacted people understand algorithmic decisions.
  • AI transparency is rarely prioritized by the leadership of respondents’ organizations, partly due to a lack of pressure to comply with the legislation.
  • While there is active research around AI explainability (XAI) tools, there are fewer examples of effective deployment and use of such tools, and little confidence in their effectiveness.
  • Apart from information on data bias, there is little work on sharing information on system design, metrics, or wider impacts on individuals and society. Builders generally do not employ criteria established for social and environmental transparency, nor do they consider unintended consequences.
  • Providing appropriate explanations to various stakeholders poses a challenge for developers. There is a noticeable discrepancy between the information survey respondents currently provide and the information they would find useful and recommend.

Topics covered in the report include:

  • Meaningful AI transparency
  • Transparency stakeholders and their needs
  • Motivations and priorities of builders around AI transparency
  • Transparency tools and methods
  • Awareness of social and ecological impact
  • Transparency delivery – practices and recommendations
  • Ranking challenges for greater AI transparency

You can read the report in full here. A PDF version is here.




Lucy Smith is Senior Managing Editor for AIhub.
Lucy Smith is Senior Managing Editor for AIhub.




            AIhub is supported by:


Related posts :



Interview with Onur Boyar: Drug and material design using generative models and Bayesian optimization

  09 May 2025
Find out how Onur is applying machine learning techniques to bioinformatics-related problems.

2025 AI Index Report

  08 May 2025
Read the latest edition of the AI Index Report which tracks and visualises data related to AI.

Defending against prompt injection with structured queries (StruQ) and preference optimization (SecAlign)

  06 May 2025
Recent advances in LLMs enable exciting LLM-integrated applications. However, as LLMs have improved, so have the attacks against them.

Forthcoming machine learning and AI seminars: May 2025 edition

  05 May 2025
A list of free-to-attend AI-related seminars that are scheduled to take place between 5 May and 30 June 2025.

Competition open for images of “digital transformation at work”

Digit and Better Images of AI have teamed up to launch a competition to create more realistic stock images of "digital transformation at work"
monthly digest

AIhub monthly digest: April 2025 – aligning GenAI with technical standards, ML applied to semiconductor manufacturing, and social choice problems

  30 Apr 2025
Welcome to our monthly digest, where you can catch up with AI research, events and news from the month past.



 

AIhub is supported by:






©2025.05 - Association for the Understanding of Artificial Intelligence


 












©2025.05 - Association for the Understanding of Artificial Intelligence