ΑΙhub.org
 

AI transparency in practice: a report


by
22 March 2023



share this:

Abstract microscopic photography of a Graphics Processing Unit resembling a satellite image of a big cityFritzchens Fritz / Better Images of AI / GPU shot etched 5 / Licenced by CC-BY 4.0

A report, co-authored by Ramak Molavi Vasse’i (Mozilla’s Insights Team) and Jesse McCrosky (Thoughtworks), investigates the issue of AI transparency. The pair dig into what AI transparency actually means, and aim to provide useful and actionable information for specific stakeholders. The report also details a survey of current approaches, assesses their limitations, and outlines how meaningful transparency might be achieved.

The authors have highlighted the following key findings from their report:

  • The focus of builders is primarily on system accuracy and debugging, rather than helping end users and impacted people understand algorithmic decisions.
  • AI transparency is rarely prioritized by the leadership of respondents’ organizations, partly due to a lack of pressure to comply with the legislation.
  • While there is active research around AI explainability (XAI) tools, there are fewer examples of effective deployment and use of such tools, and little confidence in their effectiveness.
  • Apart from information on data bias, there is little work on sharing information on system design, metrics, or wider impacts on individuals and society. Builders generally do not employ criteria established for social and environmental transparency, nor do they consider unintended consequences.
  • Providing appropriate explanations to various stakeholders poses a challenge for developers. There is a noticeable discrepancy between the information survey respondents currently provide and the information they would find useful and recommend.

Topics covered in the report include:

  • Meaningful AI transparency
  • Transparency stakeholders and their needs
  • Motivations and priorities of builders around AI transparency
  • Transparency tools and methods
  • Awareness of social and ecological impact
  • Transparency delivery – practices and recommendations
  • Ranking challenges for greater AI transparency

You can read the report in full here. A PDF version is here.




Lucy Smith is Senior Managing Editor for AIhub.
Lucy Smith is Senior Managing Editor for AIhub.




            AIhub is supported by:



Related posts :



Designing value-aligned autonomous vehicles: from moral dilemmas to conflict-sensitive design

  13 Nov 2025
Autonomous systems increasingly face value-laden choices. This blog post introduces the idea of designing “conflict-sensitive” autonomous traffic agents that explicitly recognise, reason about, and act upon competing ethical, legal, and social values.

Learning from failure to tackle extremely hard problems

  12 Nov 2025
This blog post is based on the work "BaNEL: Exploration posteriors for generative modeling using only negative rewards".

How AI can improve storm surge forecasts to help save lives

  10 Nov 2025
Looking at how AI models can help provide more detailed forecasts more quickly.

Rewarding explainability in drug repurposing with knowledge graphs

and   07 Nov 2025
A RL approach that not only predicts which drug-disease pairs might hold promise but also explains why.

AI Song Contest – vote for your favourite

  06 Nov 2025
Voting is open until 9 November.



 

AIhub is supported by:






 












©2025.05 - Association for the Understanding of Artificial Intelligence