ΑΙhub.org
 

AI transparency in practice: a report


by
22 March 2023



share this:

Abstract microscopic photography of a Graphics Processing Unit resembling a satellite image of a big cityFritzchens Fritz / Better Images of AI / GPU shot etched 5 / Licenced by CC-BY 4.0

A report, co-authored by Ramak Molavi Vasse’i (Mozilla’s Insights Team) and Jesse McCrosky (Thoughtworks), investigates the issue of AI transparency. The pair dig into what AI transparency actually means, and aim to provide useful and actionable information for specific stakeholders. The report also details a survey of current approaches, assesses their limitations, and outlines how meaningful transparency might be achieved.

The authors have highlighted the following key findings from their report:

  • The focus of builders is primarily on system accuracy and debugging, rather than helping end users and impacted people understand algorithmic decisions.
  • AI transparency is rarely prioritized by the leadership of respondents’ organizations, partly due to a lack of pressure to comply with the legislation.
  • While there is active research around AI explainability (XAI) tools, there are fewer examples of effective deployment and use of such tools, and little confidence in their effectiveness.
  • Apart from information on data bias, there is little work on sharing information on system design, metrics, or wider impacts on individuals and society. Builders generally do not employ criteria established for social and environmental transparency, nor do they consider unintended consequences.
  • Providing appropriate explanations to various stakeholders poses a challenge for developers. There is a noticeable discrepancy between the information survey respondents currently provide and the information they would find useful and recommend.

Topics covered in the report include:

  • Meaningful AI transparency
  • Transparency stakeholders and their needs
  • Motivations and priorities of builders around AI transparency
  • Transparency tools and methods
  • Awareness of social and ecological impact
  • Transparency delivery – practices and recommendations
  • Ranking challenges for greater AI transparency

You can read the report in full here. A PDF version is here.




Lucy Smith is Senior Managing Editor for AIhub.
Lucy Smith is Senior Managing Editor for AIhub.




            AIhub is supported by:



Related posts :



AIhub interview highlights 2025

  22 Dec 2025
Join us for a look back at some of the interviews we've conducted with members of the AI community.

Identifying patterns in insect scents using machine learning

  19 Dec 2025
Scientists will use machine learning to predict what types of molecules interact with insect olfactory receptors.

2025 AAAI / ACM SIGAI Doctoral Consortium interviews compilation

  18 Dec 2025
We collate our interviews with the 2025 cohort of doctoral consortium participants.

A backlash against AI imagery in ads may have begun as brands promote ‘human-made’

  17 Dec 2025
In a wave of new ads, brands like Heineken, Polaroid and Cadbury have started celebrating their work as “human-made”.

AIhub blog post highlights 2025

  16 Dec 2025
As the year draws to a close, we take a look back at some of our favourite blog posts.

Using machine learning to track greenhouse gas emissions

  15 Dec 2025
PhD candidate Julia Wąsala searches for greenhouse gas emissions in satellite data.

AAAI 2025 presidential panel on the future of AI research – video discussion on AGI

  12 Dec 2025
Watch the first in a series of video discussions from AAAI.

The Machine Ethics podcast: the AI bubble with Tim El-Sheikh

Ben chats to Tim about AI use cases, whether GenAI is even safe, the AI bubble, replacing human workers, data oligarchies and more.



 

AIhub is supported by:






 












©2025.05 - Association for the Understanding of Artificial Intelligence