ΑΙhub.org
 

AI transparency in practice: a report


by
22 March 2023



share this:

Abstract microscopic photography of a Graphics Processing Unit resembling a satellite image of a big cityFritzchens Fritz / Better Images of AI / GPU shot etched 5 / Licenced by CC-BY 4.0

A report, co-authored by Ramak Molavi Vasse’i (Mozilla’s Insights Team) and Jesse McCrosky (Thoughtworks), investigates the issue of AI transparency. The pair dig into what AI transparency actually means, and aim to provide useful and actionable information for specific stakeholders. The report also details a survey of current approaches, assesses their limitations, and outlines how meaningful transparency might be achieved.

The authors have highlighted the following key findings from their report:

  • The focus of builders is primarily on system accuracy and debugging, rather than helping end users and impacted people understand algorithmic decisions.
  • AI transparency is rarely prioritized by the leadership of respondents’ organizations, partly due to a lack of pressure to comply with the legislation.
  • While there is active research around AI explainability (XAI) tools, there are fewer examples of effective deployment and use of such tools, and little confidence in their effectiveness.
  • Apart from information on data bias, there is little work on sharing information on system design, metrics, or wider impacts on individuals and society. Builders generally do not employ criteria established for social and environmental transparency, nor do they consider unintended consequences.
  • Providing appropriate explanations to various stakeholders poses a challenge for developers. There is a noticeable discrepancy between the information survey respondents currently provide and the information they would find useful and recommend.

Topics covered in the report include:

  • Meaningful AI transparency
  • Transparency stakeholders and their needs
  • Motivations and priorities of builders around AI transparency
  • Transparency tools and methods
  • Awareness of social and ecological impact
  • Transparency delivery – practices and recommendations
  • Ranking challenges for greater AI transparency

You can read the report in full here. A PDF version is here.




Lucy Smith is Senior Managing Editor for AIhub.
Lucy Smith is Senior Managing Editor for AIhub.




            AIhub is supported by:



Related posts :



monthly digest

AIhub monthly digest: November 2025 – learning robust controllers, trust in multi-agent systems, and a new fairness evaluation dataset

  28 Nov 2025
Welcome to our monthly digest, where you can catch up with AI research, events and news from the month past.

EU proposal to delay parts of its AI Act signal a policy shift that prioritises big tech over fairness

  27 Nov 2025
The EC has proposed delaying parts of the act until 2027 following intense pressure from tech companies and the Trump administration.

Better images of AI on book covers

  25 Nov 2025
We share insights from Chrissi Nerantzi on the decisions behind the cover of the open-sourced book ‘Learning with AI’, and reflect on the significance of book covers.

What is AI poisoning? A computer scientist explains

  24 Nov 2025
Poisoning is a growing problem in the world of AI – in particular, for large language models.

New AI technique sounding out audio deepfakes

  21 Nov 2025
Researchers discover a smarter way to detect audio deepfakes that is more accurate and adaptable to keep pace with evolving threats.

Learning robust controllers that work across many partially observable environments

  20 Nov 2025
Exploring designing controllers that perform reliably even when the environment may not be precisely known.

ACM SIGAI Autonomous Agents Award 2026 open for nominations

  19 Nov 2025
Nominations are solicited for the 2026 ACM SIGAI Autonomous Agents Research Award.



 

AIhub is supported by:






 












©2025.05 - Association for the Understanding of Artificial Intelligence