ΑΙhub.org
 

AI transparency in practice: a report


by
22 March 2023



share this:

Abstract microscopic photography of a Graphics Processing Unit resembling a satellite image of a big cityFritzchens Fritz / Better Images of AI / GPU shot etched 5 / Licenced by CC-BY 4.0

A report, co-authored by Ramak Molavi Vasse’i (Mozilla’s Insights Team) and Jesse McCrosky (Thoughtworks), investigates the issue of AI transparency. The pair dig into what AI transparency actually means, and aim to provide useful and actionable information for specific stakeholders. The report also details a survey of current approaches, assesses their limitations, and outlines how meaningful transparency might be achieved.

The authors have highlighted the following key findings from their report:

  • The focus of builders is primarily on system accuracy and debugging, rather than helping end users and impacted people understand algorithmic decisions.
  • AI transparency is rarely prioritized by the leadership of respondents’ organizations, partly due to a lack of pressure to comply with the legislation.
  • While there is active research around AI explainability (XAI) tools, there are fewer examples of effective deployment and use of such tools, and little confidence in their effectiveness.
  • Apart from information on data bias, there is little work on sharing information on system design, metrics, or wider impacts on individuals and society. Builders generally do not employ criteria established for social and environmental transparency, nor do they consider unintended consequences.
  • Providing appropriate explanations to various stakeholders poses a challenge for developers. There is a noticeable discrepancy between the information survey respondents currently provide and the information they would find useful and recommend.

Topics covered in the report include:

  • Meaningful AI transparency
  • Transparency stakeholders and their needs
  • Motivations and priorities of builders around AI transparency
  • Transparency tools and methods
  • Awareness of social and ecological impact
  • Transparency delivery – practices and recommendations
  • Ranking challenges for greater AI transparency

You can read the report in full here. A PDF version is here.




Lucy Smith is Senior Managing Editor for AIhub.
Lucy Smith is Senior Managing Editor for AIhub.

            AUAI is supported by:



Subscribe to AIhub newsletter on substack



Related posts :

Forthcoming machine learning and AI seminars: October 2026 edition

  02 Oct 2026
A list of free-to-attend AI-related seminars that are scheduled to take place in the next couple of months.

Rebuilding the brain with neuromorphic computing: an interview with Oliver Rhodes

  01 Oct 2026
Neuromorphic computing takes inspiration from biology to build faster, more energy efficient systems.
monthly digest

AIhub monthly digest: September 2026 – tracking animal populations, recommender systems, and an interview with Ken Goldberg

  29 Sep 2026
Welcome to our monthly digest, where you can catch up with AI research, events and news from the month past.

AI-powered platforms uncover proteins that organise cellular compartments

Two platforms could enable researchers to more accurately predict proteins that undergo phase separation.

When compression techniques don’t just add up: Interaction effects in hybrid LLM compression

  25 Sep 2026
New research finds that combining common LLM compression techniques doesn't just add up — sometimes it backfires, sometimes it surprises.

What’s coming up at #IROS2026?

  24 Sep 2026
Find out what the International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems has in store.

IJCAI-ECAI 2026 tutorial / workshop round-up part 1

  23 Sep 2026
Find out more about two sessions on data-centric AI and a trustworthy agentic AI roadmap.


↑


AUAI is supported by:







Subscribe to AIhub newsletter on substack




 















©2026.05 - Association for the Understanding of Artificial Intelligence