ΑΙhub.org
 

European parliament approves draft EU AI act


by
16 June 2023



share this:
EU flag

An important milestone in the process of EU AI legislation was taken on 14 June when the European parliament voted in favour of adopting the proposed AI act (with 499 votes in favour, 28 against and 93 abstentions). The next step will involve talks with EU member states on the final form of the law. The aim is to reach an agreement by the end of this year.

At the core of the proposed act is a risk-based approach, which establishes obligations for providers and those deploying AI systems depending on the level of risk posed.

AI systems deemed to present an “unacceptable risk” would be completely prohibited. In the draft act, this includes “real-time” biometric identification systems (when deployed in publicly accessible spaces), systems that deploy harmful manipulative “subliminal techniques”, systems that exploit specific vulnerable groups, and systems used by public authorities, or on their behalf, for social scoring purposes.

Systems classified as “high risk” would be subject to new regulations including registration of these systems by the providers in an EU-wide database before releasing to the market, and the necessity to comply with a range of requirements including those relating to risk management, testing, technical robustness, data training and data governance, transparency, human oversight, and cybersecurity. Such high-risk applications will include AI systems that pose significant harm to people’s health, safety, fundamental rights or the environment.

AI systems presenting “limited risk” would be subject to a limited set of transparency obligations. All other AI systems presenting only low or minimal risk could be developed and used in the EU without conforming to any additional legal obligations.

On the subject of generative AI, systems based on such models, like ChatGPT, would have to comply with transparency requirements (disclosing that the content was AI-generated, also helping distinguish deep-fake images from real ones) and ensure safeguards against generating illegal content. Detailed summaries of the copyrighted data used for their training would also have to be made publicly available.

You can read more details about the proposed AI act in this document.



tags:


Lucy Smith is Senior Managing Editor for AIhub.
Lucy Smith is Senior Managing Editor for AIhub.




            AIhub is supported by:



Related posts :



Memory traces in reinforcement learning

  12 Sep 2025
Onno writes about work presented at ICML 2025, introducing an alternative memory framework.

Apertus: a fully open, transparent, multilingual language model

  11 Sep 2025
EPFL, ETH Zurich and the Swiss National Supercomputing Centre (CSCS) released Apertus today, Switzerland’s first large-scale, open, multilingual language model.

Interview with Yezi Liu: Trustworthy and efficient machine learning

  10 Sep 2025
Read the latest interview in our series featuring the AAAI/SIGAI Doctoral Consortium participants.

Advanced AI models are not always better than simple ones

  09 Sep 2025
Researchers have developed Systema, a new tool to evaluate how well AI models work when predicting the effects of genetic perturbations.

The Machine Ethics podcast: Autonomy AI with Adir Ben-Yehuda

This episode Adir and Ben chat about AI automation for frontend web development, where human-machine interface could be going, allowing an LLM to optimism itself, job displacement, vibe coding and more.

Using generative AI, researchers design compounds that can kill drug-resistant bacteria

  05 Sep 2025
The team used two different AI approaches to design novel antibiotics, including one that showed promise against MRSA.

#IJCAI2025 distinguished paper: Combining MORL with restraining bolts to learn normative behaviour

and   04 Sep 2025
The authors introduce a framework for guiding reinforcement learning agents to comply with social, legal, and ethical norms.

How the internet and its bots are sabotaging scientific research

  03 Sep 2025
What most people have failed to fully realise is that internet research has brought along risks of data corruption or impersonation.



 

AIhub is supported by:






 












©2025.05 - Association for the Understanding of Artificial Intelligence