ΑΙhub.org
 

The TAILOR roadmap for trustworthy AI


by
21 October 2022



share this:

Fredrik Heintz sat on a couch“Legislation and standards must be based on knowledge. This is where we researchers can contribute, providing information about the current forefront of research, and making well-grounded decisions possible. It’s important that experts have the opportunity to influence questions of this type,” says Fredrik Heintz. Photo credit: Anna Nilsen

By Anders Törneholm

The place of artificial intelligence, AI, in our everyday life is increasing and many researchers believe that what we have seen so far is only the beginning. However, AI must be trustworthy in all situations. Linköping University is coordinating TAILOR, a EU project that has drawn up a research-based roadmap intended to guide research funding bodies and decision-makers towards the trustworthy AI of the future.

“The development of artificial intelligence is in its infancy. When we look back at what we are doing today in 50 years, we will find it pretty primitive. In other words, most of the field remains to be discovered. That’s why it’s important to lay the foundation of trustworthy AI now,” says Fredrik Heintz, professor of artificial intelligence at LiU, and coordinator of the TAILOR project.

TAILOR is one of six research networks set up by the EU to strengthen research capacity and develop the AI of the future. The foundation of trustworthy AI is being laid by TAILOR, by drawing up a framework, guidelines and a specification of the needs of the AI research community. “TAILOR” is an abbreviation of Foundations of Trustworthy AI – integrating, learning, optimisation and reasoning.

Three criteria

The roadmap now presented by TAILOR is the first step on the way to standardisation, where the idea is that decision-makers and research funding bodies can gain insight into what is required to develop trustworthy AI. Fredrik Heintz believes that it is a good idea to show that many research problems must be solved before this can be achieved.

The researchers have defined three criteria for trustworthy AI: it must conform to laws and regulations, it must satisfy several ethical principles, and its implementation it must be robust and safe. Fredrik Heintz points out that these criteria pose major challenges, in particular the implementation of the ethical principles.

“Take justice, for example. Does this mean an equal distribution of resources or that all actors receive the resources needed to bring them all to the same level? We are facing major long-term questions, and it will take time before they are answered. Remember – the definition of justice has been debated by philosophers and scholars for hundreds of years,” says Fredrik Heintz.

Human centered

The project will focus on large comprehensive research questions, and will attempt to find standards that all who work with AI can adopt. But Fredrik Heintz is convinced that we can only achieve this if basic research into AI is given priority.

“People often regard AI as a technology issue, but what’s really important is whether we gain societal benefit from it. If we are to obtain AI that can be trusted and that functions well in society, we must make sure that it is centred on people,” says Fredrik Heintz.

Many of the legal proposals written within the EU and its member states are written by legal specialists. But Fredrik Heintz believes that they lack expert knowledge within AI, which is a problem.

“Legislation and standards must be based on knowledge. This is where we researchers can contribute, providing information about the current forefront of research, and making well-grounded decisions possible. It’s important that experts have the opportunity to influence questions of this type,” says Fredrik Heintz.

The complete roadmap is available at: Strategic Research and Innovation Roadmap of trustworthy AI.




Linköping University

            AUAI is supported by:



Subscribe to AIhub newsletter on substack



Related posts :

An invisible word of the day: watermarking assignment prompts to detect copy-pasted chatbot answers

  12 Nov 2026
SteganoPrompt lets educators embed an invisible but openly announced instruction in an assignment prompt.

AI100 longitudinal study examines how AI has entered the mainstream

  10 Nov 2026
Published every five years, the report is compiled by experts in the field.
AI pioneers

Thinking big – from constraint programming to the Holy Grail: an interview with Gene Freuder

  10 Nov 2026
In our latest instalment of AI Pioneers, we speak to Gene Freuder on the field of constraint programming, neurosymbolic and generative AI approaches in AI, and the bigger picture of computer science.

How attackers persuade AI agents to break the rules

  09 Nov 2026
As AI assistants evolve into AI agents, a study has found that the biggest safety risks in their use may not come from single malicious prompts, but from carefully orchestrated conversations.

Interview with Minji Park: humans in the loop to keep language models up to date

  06 Nov 2026
Human-AI co-inference through a shared editable state.

AI plus chemistry can expand battery electrolyte design

  05 Nov 2026
Researchers are using artificial intelligence to speed the search for better battery materials.
coffee corner

AIhub coffee corner: Are humanoids the future of embodied AI?

  04 Nov 2026
The AIhub coffee corner captures the musings of AI experts over a short conversation.

“With AI, we need to reconsider what it means to learn”

  03 Nov 2026
Artificial intelligence is forcing universities to reinvent how they teach and assess students’ knowledge.


↑


AUAI is supported by:







Subscribe to AIhub newsletter on substack




 















©2026.05 - Association for the Understanding of Artificial Intelligence