ΑΙhub.org
 

Machine learning technique helps wearable devices get better at diagnosing sleep disorders and quality

wearable devices sleep

Getting diagnosed with a sleep disorder or assessing quality of sleep is an often expensive and tricky proposition, involving sleep clinics where patients are hooked up to sensors and wires for monitoring.

Wearable devices, such as the Fitbit and Apple Watch, offer less intrusive and more cost-effective sleeping monitoring, but the tradeoff can be inaccurate or imprecise sleep data.

Researchers at the Georgia Institute of Technology are working to combine the accuracy of sleep clinics with the convenience of wearable computing by developing machine learning models, or smart algorithms, that provide better sleep measurement data as well as considerably faster, more energy-efficient software.

The team is focusing on electrical ambient noise that is emitted by devices but that is often not audible and can interfere with sleep sensors on a wearable gadget. Leave the TV on at night, and the electrical signal – not the infomercial in the background – might mess with your sleep tracker.

These additional electrical signals are problematic for wearable devices that typically have only one sensor to measure a single biometric data point, normally heart rate. A device picking up signals from ambient electrical noise skews the data and leads to potentially misleading results.

“We are building a new process to help train [machine learning] models to be used for the home environment and help address this and other issues around sleep,” said Scott Freitas, a second-year machine learning Ph.D. student and co-lead author of a newly published paper.

The team employed adversarial training in tandem with spectral regularization, a technique that makes neural networks more robust to electrical signals in the input data. This means that the system can accurately assess sleep stages even when an EEG signal is corrupted by additional signals like a TV or washing machine.

Using machine-learning methods such as sparsity regularization, the new model can also compress the amount of time it takes to gather and analyze data, as well as increase energy efficiency of the wearable device.

The researchers are testing with a product worn on the head but hope to also integrate it into smartwatches and bracelets. Results would then be transmitted to a person’s doctor to analyze and provide a diagnosis. This could result in fewer visits to the doctor, reducing the cost, time, and stress involved with receiving a sleep disorder diagnosis.

Another issue that the researchers are looking at is reducing the amount of sensors needed to accurately track sleep.

“When someone visits a sleep clinic, they are hooked up to all kinds of monitors and wires to gather data ranging from brain activity on EEG’s, heart rate, and more. Wearable tech only monitors heart rate with one sensor. The one sensor is more ideal and comfortable, so we are looking for a way to get more data without adding more wires or sensors,” said Rahul Duggal, a second-year computer science Ph.D. student and co-lead author.

The team’s work is published in the paper REST: Robust and Efficient Neural Networks for Sleep Monitoring in the Wild, accepted to the International World Wide Web Conference (WWW), scheduled to take place on 20-24 April in Taipei, Taiwan (now an online-only event).

Related research:
New deep learning approach improves access to sleep diagnostic testing




Allie McFadden is the communications officer for the Machine Learning Center at Georgia Tech and the Constellations Center for Equity in Computing at Georgia Tech.
Allie McFadden is the communications officer for the Machine Learning Center at Georgia Tech and the Constellations Center for Equity in Computing at Georgia Tech.

Machine Learning Center at Georgia Tech

            AIhub is supported by:



Subscribe to AIhub newsletter on substack



Related posts :

An AI image generator for non-English speakers

  17 Mar 2026
"Translations lose the nuances of language and culture, because many words lack good English equivalents."

AI and Theory of Mind: an interview with Nitay Alon

  16 Mar 2026
Find out more about how Theory of Mind plays out in deceptive environments, multi-agents systems, the interdisciplinary nature of this field, when to use Theory of Mind, and when not to, and more.
coffee corner

AIhub coffee corner: AI, kids, and the future – “generation AI”

  13 Mar 2026
The AIhub coffee corner captures the musings of AI experts over a short conversation.

AI chatbots can effectively sway voters – in either direction

  12 Mar 2026
A short interaction with a chatbot can meaningfully shift a voter’s opinion about a presidential candidate or proposed policy.

Studying the properties of large language models: an interview with Maxime Meyer

  11 Mar 2026
What happens when you increase the prompt length in a LLM? In the latest interview in our AAAI Doctoral Consortium series, we sat down with Maxime, a PhD student in Singapore.

What the Moltbook experiment is teaching us about AI

An experimental social media platform where only AI bots can post reveals surprising lessons about artificial intelligence behaviour and safety.

The malleable mind: context accumulation drives LLM’s belief drift

  09 Mar 2026
LLMs change their "beliefs" over time, depending on the data they are given.

RWDS Big Questions: how do we balance innovation and regulation in the world of AI?

  06 Mar 2026
The panel explores the tensions, trade-offs and practical realities facing policymakers and data scientists alike.



AIhub is supported by:







Subscribe to AIhub newsletter on substack




 















©2026.02 - Association for the Understanding of Artificial Intelligence