
latest postspopular

latest postspopular

Modelbased reinforcement learning from pixels with structured latent variable models
By Marvin Zhang and Sharad Vikram
Imagine a robot trying to learn how to stack blocks and push objects using visual inputs from a camera feed. In order to minimize cost and safety concerns, we want our robot to learn these skills with minimal interaction time, but efficient learning from complex sensory inputs such as images is difficult. This work introduces SOLAR, a new modelbased reinforcement learning (RL) method that can learn skills – including manipulation tasks on a real Sawyer robot arm – directly from visual inputs with under an hour of interaction. To our knowledge, SOLAR is the most efficient RL method for solving real world imagebased robotics tasks.
Our robot learns to stack a Lego block and push a mug onto a coaster with only inputs from a camera pointed at the robot. Each task takes an hour or less of interaction to learn.
In the RL setting, an agent such as our robot learns from its own experience through trial and error, in order to minimize a cost function corresponding to the task at hand. Many challenging tasks have been solved in recent years by RL methods, but most of these success stories come from modelfree RL methods, which typically require substantially more data than modelbased methods. However, modelbased methods often rely on the ability to accurately predict into the future in order to plan the agent’s actions. This is an issue for imagebased learning as predicting future images itself requires large amounts of interaction, which we wish to avoid.
There are some modelbased RL methods that do not require accurate future prediction, but these methods typically place stringent assumptions on the state. The LQRFLM method has been shown to learn new tasks very efficiently, including for real robotic systems, by modeling the dynamics of the state as approximately linear. This assumption, however, is prohibitive for imagebased learning, as the dynamics of pixels in a camera feed are far from linear. The question we study in our work is: how can we relax this assumption in order to develop a modelbased RL method that can solve imagebased tasks without requiring accurate future predictions?
We tackle this problem by learning a latent state representation using deep neural networks. When our agent is faced with images from the task, it can encode the images into their latent representations, which can then be used as the state inputs to LQRFLM rather than the images themselves. The key insight in SOLAR is that, in addition to learning a compact latent state that accurately captures the objects, we specifically learn a representation that works well with LQRFLM by encouraging the latent dynamics to be linear. To that end, we introduce a latent variable model that explicitly represents latent linear dynamics, and this model combined with LQRFLM provides the basis for the SOLAR algorithm.
Stochastic Optimal Control with Latent Representations
SOLAR stands for stochastic optimal control with latent representations, and it is an efficient and general solution for imagebased RL settings. The key ideas behind SOLAR are learning latent state representations where linear dynamics are accurate, as well as utilizing a modelbased RL method that does not rely on future prediction, which we describe next.
Linear Dynamical Control
Using the system state, LQRFLM and related methods have been used to successfully learn a myriad of tasks including robotic manipulation and locomotion. We aim to extend these capabilities by automatically learning the state input to LQRFLM from images.
One of the bestknown results in control theory is the linearquadratic regulator (LQR), a set of equations that provides the optimal control strategy for a system in which the dynamics are linear and the cost is quadratic. Though real world systems are almost never linear, approximations to LQR such as LQR with fitted linear models (LQRFLM) have been shown to perform well at a variety of robotic control tasks. LQRFLM has been one of the most efficient RL methods at learning control skills, even compared to other modelbased RL methods. This efficiency is enabled by the simplicity of linear models as well as the fact that these models do not need to predict accurately into the future. This makes LQRFLM an appealing method to build from, however the key limitation of this method is that it normally assumes access to the system state, e.g., the joint configuration of the robot and the positions of objects of interest, which can often be reasonably modeled as approximately linear. We instead work from images and relax this assumption by learning a representation that we can use as the input to LQRFLM.
Learning Latent States from Images
The graphical model we set up presumes that the images we observe are a function of a latent state, and the states evolve according to linear dynamics modulated by actions, and where the costs are given by a quadratic function of the state and action.
We want our agent to extract, from its visual input, a state representation where the dynamics of the state are as close to linear as possible. To accomplish this, we devise a latent variable model in which the latent states obey linear dynamics, as detailed in the graphic above. The dark nodes are what we observe from interacting with the environment – namely, images, actions taken by the agent, and costs. The light nodes are the underlying states, which is the representation that we wish to learn, and we posit that the next state is a linear function of the current state and action. This model bears strong resemblance to the structured variational autoencoder (SVAE), a model previously applied to applications such as characterizing videos of mice. The method that we use to fit our model is also based off of the method presented in this prior work.
At a high level, our method learns both the state dynamics and an encoder, which is a function that takes as input the current and past images and outputs a guess of the current state. If we encode many observation sequences corresponding to the agent’s interactions with the environment, we can see if these state sequences behave according to our learned linear dynamics – if they don’t, we adjust our dynamics and our encoder to bring them closer in line. One key aspect of this procedure is that we do not directly optimize our model to be accurate at predicting into the future, since we only fit linear models retrospectively to the agent’s previous interactions. This strongly complements LQRFLM which, again, does not rely on prediction for good performance. Our paper provides more details about our model learning procedure.
The SOLAR Algorithm
Our robot iteratively interacts with its environment, uses this data to update its model, uses this model to estimate the latent states and their dynamics, and uses these dynamics to update its behavior.
Now that we have described the building blocks of our method, how do these pieces fit together into the SOLAR method? The agent acts in the environment according to its policy, which prescribes actions based on the current latent state estimate. These interactions produce trajectories of images, actions, and costs that are then used to fit the model detailed in the previous section. Afterwards, using these entire trajectories of interactions, our model retrospectively refines its estimate of the latent dynamics, which allows LQRFLM to produce an updated policy that should perform better at the given task, i.e., incur lower costs. The updated policy is then used to collect more trajectories, and the procedure repeats. The graphic above depicts these stages of the algorithm.
The key difference between LQRFLM and most other modelbased RL methods is that the resulting models are only used for policy improvement and not for prediction into the future. This is useful in settings where the observations are complex and difficult to predict, and we extend this benefit into imagebased settings by introducing latent states that we can estimate alongside the dynamics. As seen in the next section, SOLAR can produce good policies for imagebased robotic manipulation tasks using only one hour of interaction time with the environment.
Experiments
Left: For Lego block stacking, we experiment with multiple starting positions of the arm and block. For pushing, we only use sparse rewards provided by a human pushing a key when the robot succeeds. Example image observations are given in the bottom row. Right: Examples of successful behaviors learned by SOLAR.
Our main testbed for SOLAR is the Sawyer robotic arm, which has seven degrees of freedom and can be used for a variety of manipulation tasks. We feed the robot images from a camera pointed at its arm and the relevant objects in the scene, and we task our robot with learning Lego block stacking and mug pushing, as detailed below.
Lego Block Stacking
https://youtube.com/watch?v=X5RjE–TUGs%3Frel%3D0
Using SOLAR, our Sawyer robot efficiently learns stacking from only image observations from all three initial positions. The ablations are less successful, and DVF does not learn as quickly as SOLAR. In particular, these methods have difficulty with the challenging setting where the block starts on the table.
The main challenge for block stacking stems from the precision required to succeed, as the robot must very accurately place the block in order to properly connect the pieces. Using SOLAR, the Sawyer learns this precision from only the camera feed, and moreover the robot can successfully learn to stack from a number of starting configurations of the arm and block. In particular, the configuration where the block starts on the table is the most challenging, as the Sawyer must learn to first lift the block off the table before stacking it – in other words, it can’t be “greedy” and simply move toward the other block.
We first compare SOLAR to an ablation that uses a standard variational autoencoder (VAE) rather than the SVAE, which means that the state representation is not learned to follow linear dynamics. This ablation is only successful on the easiest starting configuration. In order to understand what benefits we extract from not requiring accurate future predictions, we compare to another ablation which replaces LQRFLM with an alternative planning method known as modelpredictive control (MPC), and we also compare to a stateoftheart prior method that uses MPC, deep visual foresight (DVF). MPC has been used in a number of prior and subsequent works, and it relies on being able to generate accurate future predictions using the learned model in order to determine what actions are likely to lead to good performance.
The MPC ablation learns more quickly on the two easier configurations, however, it fails in the most difficult setting because MPC greedily reduces the distance between the two blocks rather than lifting the block off the table. MPC acts greedily because it only plans over a short horizon, as predicting future images becomes increasingly inaccurate over longer horizons, and this is exactly the failure mode that SOLAR is able to overcome by utilizing LQRFLM to avoid future predictions altogether. Finally, we find that DVF can make progress but ultimately is not able to solve the two harder settings even with more data than what we use for our method. This highlights our method’s data efficiency, as we use in total a few hours of robot data compared to days or weeks of data as in DVF.
Mug Pushing
https://youtube.com/watch?v=buk4YE2mFTs%3Frel%3D0
Despite the challenge of only having sparse rewards provided by a human key press, our robot running SOLAR learns to push the mug onto the coaster in under an hour. DVF is again not as efficient and does not learn as quickly as SOLAR.
We add an additional challenge to mug pushing by replacing the costs with a sparse reward signal, i.e., the robot only gets told when it has completed the task, and it is told nothing otherwise. As seen in the picture above, the human presses a key on the keyboard in order to provide the sparse reward, and the robot must reason about how improve its behavior in order to achieve this reward. This is implemented via a straightforward extension to SOLAR, as we detail in the paper. Despite this additional challenge, our method learns a successful policy in about an hour of interaction time, whereas DVF performs worse than our method using a comparable amount of data.
Simulated Comparisons
Left: an illustration of the car and reacher environments we experiment with, along with example image observations in the bottom row. Right: our method generally performs better than the ablations we compare to, as well as RCE. PPO has better final performance, however PPO requires one to three orders of magnitude more data than SOLAR to reach this performance.
In addition to the Sawyer experiments, we also run several comparisons in simulation, as most prior work does not experiment with real robots. In particular, we set up a 2D navigation domain where the underlying system actually has linear dynamics and quadratic cost, but we can only observe images that show a topdown view of the agent and the goal. We also include two domains that are more complex: a car that must drive from the bottom right to the top left of a 2D plane, and a 2 degree of freedom arm that is tasked with reaching to a goal in the bottom left. All domains are learned with only image observations that provide a top down view of the task.
We compare to robust locallylinear controllable embeddings (RCE), which takes a different approach to learning latent state representations that follow linear dynamics. We also compare to proximal policy optimization (PPO), a modelfree RL method that has been used to solve a number of simulated robotics domains but is not data efficient enough for real world learning. We find that SOLAR learns faster and achieves better final performance than RCE. PPO typically learns better final performance than SOLAR, but this typically requires one to three orders of magnitude more data, which again is prohibitive for most real world learning tasks. This kind of tradeoff is typical: modelfree methods tend to achieve better final performance, but modelbased methods learn much faster. Videos of the experiments can be viewed on our project website.
Related Work
Approaches to learning latent representations of images have proposed objectives such as reconstructing the image and predicting future images. These objectives do not line up perfectly with our objective of accomplishing tasks – for example, a robot tasked with sorting objects into bins by color does not need to perfectly reconstruct the color of the wall in front of it. There has also been work on learning state representations that are suitable for control, including identifying points of interest within the image and learning latent states such that dimensions are independently controllable. A recent survey paper categorizes the landscape of state representation learning.
Separately from control, there has been a number of recent works that learn structured representations of data, many of which extend VAEs. The SVAE is an example of one such framework, and some other methods also attempt to explain the data with linear dynamics. Beyond this, there have been works that learn latent representations with mixture model structure, various discrete structures, and Bayesian nonparametric structures.
Ideas that are closely related to ours have been proposed in prior and subsequent work. As mentioned before, DVF has also learned robotics tasks directly from vision, and a recent blog post summarizes their results. Embed to control and its successor RCE also aim to learn latent state representations with linear dynamics. We compare to these methods in our paper and demonstrate that our method tends to exhibit better performance. Subsequent to our work, PlaNet learns latent state representations with a mixture of deterministic and stochastic variables and uses them in conjunction with MPC, one of the baseline methods in our evaluation, demonstrating good results on several simulated tasks. As shown by our experiments, LQRFLM and MPC each have their respective strengths and weaknesses, and we found that LQRFLM was typically more successful for robotic control, avoiding the greedy behavior of MPC.
Future Work
We see several exciting directions for future work, and we’ll briefly mention two. First, we want our robots to be able to learn complex, multistage tasks, such as building Lego structures rather than just stacking one block, or setting a table rather than just pushing one mug. One way we may realize this is by providing intermediate images of the goals we want the robot to accomplish, and if we expect that the robot can learn each stage separately, it may be able to string these policies together into more complex and interesting behaviors. Second, humans don’t just learn representations of states but also actions – we don’t think about individual muscle movements, we group such movements together into “macroactions” to perform highly coordinated and sophisticated behaviors. If we can similarly learn action representations, we can enable our robots to more efficiently learn how to use hardware such as dexterous hands, which will further increase their ability to handle complex, realworld environments.
This post is based on the following paper:
 Marvin Zhang*, Sharad Vikram*, Laura Smith, Pieter Abbeel, Matthew J. Johnson, Sergey Levine.
SOLAR: Deep Structured Representations for ModelBased Reinforcement Learning.
International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2019.
Project webpage
Opensource code
We would like to thank our coauthors, without whom this work would not be possible, for also contributing to and providing feedback on this post, in particular Sergey Levine. We would also like to thank the many people that have provided insightful discussions, helpful suggestions, and constructive reviews that have shaped this work. This article was initially published on the BAIR blog, and appears here with the authors’ permission.