ΑΙhub.org
 

Conferences – could virtual be a reality?


by
12 March 2020



share this:

The outbreak of COVID-19 has seen disruption and cancellation of a number of scientific conferences. One of the biggest casualties was the APS March meeting, the world’s largest physics conference, with organisers making the difficult decision to call the event off less than 36 hours before the scientific sessions were due to start. Elsewhere, the ICLR (International Conference on Learning Representations), scheduled for April, has made the decision to go fully virtual. Could the trial of online solutions, albeit under unfortunate circumstances, herald the start of a new conference era?

The APS March meeting and ICLR are among many events affected in some way by coronavirus. In early February the AAAI meeting in New York had to make some last-minute re-arrangements due to the travel ban that affected participants from China. I was lucky enough to attend this event and the impression I got was that the organisers did a good job in dealing with the situation. Researchers who were unable to travel could send in recordings of their presentations and these were played to the audience instead. Although it was a real shame for the presenters that they couldn’t be there in person the virtual talks had some advantages: all of these talks ran to time, the presenters had recorded in advance in the comfort of their own lab so weren’t nervous, and there was no sweating over a tricky question posed by an eagle-eyed audience member.

Fast-forward a month and the virus situation had become more serious. Although most physicists agreed that the APS March cancellation was the right decision, the last-minute nature of the announcement didn’t go down well, with a large number of delegates already having made the journey to Denver when they found out the news. Some researchers quickly sprang into action, arranging virtual meetings and setting up repositories for talks and posters. The first live virtual meeting was on the topic of machine learning in quantum physics and quantum computation.

The ICLR made an announcement on Twitter on 10 March about their event:

They plan to try a fully virtual conference. As I write the details are, understandably, yet to be finalised, with the organisers actively discussing a number of options. For the time being though, all authors have been asked to prepare a five minute video. Authors who were due to give a long talk have also been asked to prepare a 15 minute video. Attendance fees have been slashed to $100 ($50 for students).

These virtual sessions organised with very little planning time indicate that it should be possible to hold large online events in future. Indeed, remote attendance is something that many scientists have long been calling for. Such flexibility would improve matters for scientists with families, those with disabilities, and people who are trying to cut down on travel, for environmental or other reasons.

Many researchers are concerned about the environmental impact of conferences and the associated travel. Yoshia Bengio recently wrote about his suggestions for more sustainable events. One idea he proposes is that instead of having a major conference at one location, there could be local meeting places around the world (at least one in each continent), so that most people could attend their local meeting. These meetings would be connected electronically. The ACM Collective Intelligence event, planned for June, is already heading in that direction, with the conference split between two locations: Boston and Copenhagen.

There is no shying away from the environmental impact of large international events. However, face-to-face meetings remain incredibly valuable and it’s hard to recreate the buzz in an auditorium following a particularly good talk. Conferences can also be vital for young researchers looking to network and build their careers. Another important consideration is the financial impact on societies, many of whom rely on conferences as a major source of income. It will be interesting to see how researchers and conferences strike a balance between sustainability and social interactions and whether we will see a new type of event emerge.

Have you been affected by a conference cancellation? Tweet us at @aihuborg.




Lucy Smith is Senior Managing Editor for AIhub.
Lucy Smith is Senior Managing Editor for AIhub.

            AIhub is supported by:



Subscribe to AIhub newsletter on substack



Related posts :

monthly digest

AIhub monthly digest: February 2026 – collective decision making, multi-modal learning, and governing the rise of interactive AI

  27 Feb 2026
Welcome to our monthly digest, where you can catch up with AI research, events and news from the month past.

The Good Robot podcast: the role of designers in AI ethics with Tomasz Hollanek

  26 Feb 2026
In this episode, Tomasz argues that design is central to AI ethics and explores the role designers should play in shaping ethical AI systems.

Reinforcement learning applied to autonomous vehicles: an interview with Oliver Chang

  25 Feb 2026
In the third of our interviews with the 2026 AAAI Doctoral Consortium cohort, we hear from Oliver Chang.

The Machine Ethics podcast: moral agents with Jen Semler

In this episode, Ben and Jen Semler talk about what makes a moral agent, the point of moral agents, philosopher and engineer collaborations, and more.

Extending the reward structure in reinforcement learning: an interview with Tanmay Ambadkar

  23 Feb 2026
Find out more about Tanmay's research on RL frameworks, the latest in our series meeting the AAAI Doctoral Consortium participants.

The Good Robot podcast: what makes a drone “good”? with Beryl Pong

  20 Feb 2026
In this episode, Eleanor and Kerry talk to Beryl Pong about what it means to think about drones as “good” or “ethical” technologies.

Relational neurosymbolic Markov models

and   19 Feb 2026
Relational neurosymbolic Markov models make deep sequential models logically consistent, intervenable and generalisable

AI enables a Who’s Who of brown bears in Alaska

  18 Feb 2026
A team of scientists from EPFL and Alaska Pacific University has developed an AI program that can recognize individual bears in the wild, despite the substantial changes that occur in their appearance over the summer season.



AIhub is supported by:







Subscribe to AIhub newsletter on substack




 















©2026.02 - Association for the Understanding of Artificial Intelligence