ΑΙhub.org
 

Digital health interventions: predicting individual success using machine learning


by
13 April 2020



share this:

Health apps could be better tailored to the individual needs of patients. A statistical technique from the field of machine learning is now making it possible to predict the success of smartphone-based interventions more accurately. These are the findings of an international research team led by the University of Basel and reported in the Journal of Affective Disorders.

Health apps are increasingly used in the context of physical and mental illnesses. Usually, they do not replace traditional treatments but act as adds-on – for example, to improve mood in cases of depression. Smartphone-based interventions are of particular relevance in low or middle-income countries, where traditional treatment options are not always or only partially available.

Predicting improvement in mood

However, the impact of these apps varies from individual to individual. And even in the same person, the interventions have stronger or weaker effects depending on the situation. A research group from the Faculty of Psychology at the University of Basel, led by Professor Marion Tegethoff and Professor Gunther Meinlschmidt, investigated how the impact of smartphone-based interventions can be predicted more accurately. To this end, they used data from 324 smartphone-based interventions that aimed to regulate mood.

They employed a statistical technique from the field of machine learning, a specific form of the random forest method. This classification method can be used to process large volumes of data. The strength of this procedure is that it allows researchers to offer the decision trees relevant and theory-driven information, such as how tired or restless a subject is. The “learning forest” combines these characteristics with each other in multiple different ways and allows for predictions that reflect the complexity of real life more effectively than those of traditional prediction methods.

Halving the number of unsuccessful uses

In the case described, approximately 6 out of 10 interventions resulted in no mood improvements. In the interventions predicted to be successful by machine learning, however, this number was only around 3 in 10. Hence, with this new technique, the number of unsuccessful uses could be cut by half.

“We know that many patients quickly abandon digital interventions after they start using them. If an app is only effective in one out of every two or three uses, people soon lose motivation and see little point in using it any longer. Therefore, the new approach could potentially lead to patients using smartphone-based interventions for longer periods,” explains Professor Meinlschmidt, first author of the article. Further, the study delivers important information on how interventions can be better tailored to the individual, in terms of personalized treatment, in future. One could envisage using the approach in many other fields where mobile apps are applied.

The study was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation and the National Research Foundation of Korea, and conducted in collaboration with Korea University, Harvard Medical School, the International Psychoanalytic University Berlin and RWTH Aachen, under the leadership of the University of Basel.

Read the research paper to find out more:

Personalized prediction of smartphone-based psychotherapeutic micro-intervention success using machine learning
Gunther Meinlschmidt, Marion Tegethoff, Angelo Belardi, Esther Stalujanis, Minkyung Oh, Eun Kyung Jung, Hyun-Chul Kim, Seung-Schik Yoo, Jong-Hwan Lee
Journal of Affective Disorders (2019)




University of Basel

            AIhub is supported by:



Subscribe to AIhub newsletter on substack



Related posts :

RWDS Big Questions: how do we balance innovation and regulation in the world of AI?

  06 Mar 2026
The panel explores the tensions, trade-offs and practical realities facing policymakers and data scientists alike.

Studying multiplicity: an interview with Prakhar Ganesh

  05 Mar 2026
What is multiplicity, and what implications does it have for fairness, privacy and interpretability in real-world systems?

Top AI ethics and policy issues of 2025 and what to expect in 2026

, and   04 Mar 2026
In the latest issue of AI Matters, a publication of ACM SIGAI, Larry Medsker summarised the year in AI ethics and policy, and looked ahead to 2026.

The greatest risk of AI in higher education isn’t cheating – it’s the erosion of learning itself

  03 Mar 2026
Will AI hollow out the pipeline of students, researchers and faculty that is the basis of today’s universities?

Forthcoming machine learning and AI seminars: March 2026 edition

  02 Mar 2026
A list of free-to-attend AI-related seminars that are scheduled to take place between 2 March and 30 April 2026.
monthly digest

AIhub monthly digest: February 2026 – collective decision making, multi-modal learning, and governing the rise of interactive AI

  27 Feb 2026
Welcome to our monthly digest, where you can catch up with AI research, events and news from the month past.

The Good Robot podcast: the role of designers in AI ethics with Tomasz Hollanek

  26 Feb 2026
In this episode, Tomasz argues that design is central to AI ethics and explores the role designers should play in shaping ethical AI systems.

Reinforcement learning applied to autonomous vehicles: an interview with Oliver Chang

  25 Feb 2026
In the third of our interviews with the 2026 AAAI Doctoral Consortium cohort, we hear from Oliver Chang.



AIhub is supported by:







Subscribe to AIhub newsletter on substack




 















©2026.02 - Association for the Understanding of Artificial Intelligence