ΑΙhub.org
 

Finding unique drug structures with artificial intelligence and chemistry


by
04 June 2020



share this:
Kinase
Dihydroxyacetone Kinase. Credit: Wikipedia Commons. Reproduced under a CC-BY-SA 3.0 license.

By Bryce Benda

In the search for new medicines for diseases such as cancer, a Leiden team has developed a new workflow. This approach combines artificial intelligence (AI) with molecular modelling and is suitable for finding unknown and innovative drug structures, the researchers demonstrated.

Anti-cancer target

With their new method, the researchers of the Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research (LACDR) and the Leiden Institute of Advanced Computer Science (LIACS) were able to find five substances with an inhibitory effect on a specific type of kinase. Kinases are enzymes that switch other proteins on or off and play an important role in the development of cancer. In their publication in the Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, the team looked at so-called polypharmacology – drug development in which there are multiple targets in the body.

Polypharmacology

In classical drug development, scientists are looking for a drug that works on a single target in the body. The drug is the key, which only fits in one lock: the target in the body, often a protein. In so-called multi-target drug design, the drug can be represented as a master key that fits several targets at the same time. This is especially necessary for the treatment of complex diseases such as cancer and diabetes because these involve multiple physical processes. Moreover, multi-target drug design helps against resistance, Lindsey Burggraaff (first author and PhD candidate) explains: ‘The cancer cells in our example can become resistant to a drug with only one target, but with multiple targets in the body this chance is much smaller.’ A disadvantage of multi-target drug design is that it is more complex and time-consuming than the traditional approach.

The challenge

It started in December 2017 with a challenge, says Burggraaff. ‘A non-profit organisation led by American universities and several pharmaceutical companies regularly organises challenges, including this Multi-targeting Drug DREAM Challenge.’ Participants were instructed to find molecules that bind to multiple kinases. ‘There have already been found substances that are active on several kinases, but they all look very similar,’ says Burggraaff. ‘That’s why we wanted to find new and original hits. These hits then serve as a starting point for further drug research, like a template that you can optimise.’

Lindsey Burggraaff

Lindsey Burggraaff

A new strategy

Because the team wanted to find new and original molecules in a limited time, they also had to come up with a new strategy. Burggraaff: ‘In general, people choose either machine learning or computational chemistry in their search for medicines. We are now arguing that in the case of polypharmacology it is best to combine the two, especially if you want to find new structures in a short period of time.’

Training the computer

This works as follows: Burggraaff and her department gave the LIACS researchers an exercise set, which contained known molecules and their properties. Using machine learning, the computer scientists were able to train their computer model in such a way that it only extracted the active molecules from the set. For the challenge, they then applied this same model to a database of more than ten million substances. ‘This resulted in a quarter of a million potentially active molecules. An effective first filter,’ says the PhD candidate.

Lock and key

Then the pharmacologists of the LACDR set to work on structure-based research. ‘This involves simulation of the structure of your target on the computer, in this case, kinase enzymes,’ says Burggraaff. ‘The computer calculates whether the molecule that is tested fits into the target, like a key in a lock. This method is much more detailed than machine learning but also takes up much more time. That’s why the combination works so well.’

Ultimately, their efforts yielded five molecules that showed activity in lab tests. ‘Proof that our new way of working can be useful. By the way, it is not limited to kinase research, it can also be widely applied to other targets.’

Collaboration

The collaboration with LIACS stimulated the establishment of the Centre for Computational Life Sciences (CCLS) – a cluster of about forty scientists, including researchers from the Institute of Biology Leiden (IBL), the Mathematical Institute (MI), the Leiden Institute of Chemistry (LIC) and the Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC). ‘We speak to the scientists from the Computer Science department regularly, so that is how the collaboration for this paper started,’ says Burggraaff. She calls it a successful collaboration. ‘We only had three months for this challenge, and a lot of work to do. So we have been really pushing each other.’

Disciplines are growing closer together

‘The CCLS is a successful example of how the various classical disciplines are growing closer together on the cutting edge of computer science,’ says Gerard van Westen, last author. ‘With the SAILS programme, we are similarly combining the expertise of all faculties in the field of AI, but then on the level of the entire University. You can see that there are similar challenges in very different fields that we can solve together.’ In the future, Burggraaff and Van Westen expect that projects such as this, in which the expertise of various scientists is used for a concrete purpose, will lead to new insights and innovative medicines.

Read the research article in full

Lindsey Burggraaff et al, Successive Statistical and Structure-Based Modeling to Identify Chemically Novel Kinase Inhibitors, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (2020)




Universiteit Leiden

            AUAI is supported by:



Subscribe to AIhub newsletter on substack



Related posts :

Gradient-based planning for world models at longer horizons

  11 May 2026
What were the problems that motivated this project and what was the approach to address them?

It’s tempting to offload your thinking to AI. Cognitive science shows why that’s a bad idea

  08 May 2026
Increased offloading to new tools has raised the fear that people will become overly reliant on AI.

Making AI systems more transparent and trustworthy: an interview with Ximing Wen

  07 May 2026
Find out more about Ximing's work, experience as a research intern, and what inspired her to study AI.

Report on foundation model impacts released

  06 May 2026
Partnership on AI publish a progress report on post-deployment governance practices.

Forthcoming machine learning and AI seminars: May 2026 edition

  05 May 2026
A list of free-to-attend AI-related seminars that are scheduled to take place between 5 May and 30 June 2026.

AI for Science – from cosmology to chemistry

  01 May 2026
How AI is transforming science, from a day conference at the Royal Society
monthly digest

AIhub monthly digest: April 2026 – machine learning for particle physics, AI Index Report, and table tennis

  30 Apr 2026
Welcome to our monthly digest, where you can catch up with AI research, events and news from the month past.

The Machine Ethics podcast: organoid computing with Dr Ewelina Kurtys

In this episode, Ben chats to Ewelina about the uses of organoids and energy saving computing, differences between biological neurons and digital neural networks, and much more.



AUAI is supported by:







Subscribe to AIhub newsletter on substack




 















©2026.02 - Association for the Understanding of Artificial Intelligence