ΑΙhub.org
 

Preparing for emergency response with partial network information


by
15 December 2020



share this:

By Kristen Perez, Machine Learning Center at Georgia Tech and School of Computational Science and Engineering.

Natural disasters cause considerable economic damage, loss of life, and network disruptions each year. As emergency response and infrastructure systems are interdependent and interconnected, quick assessment and repair in the event of disruption is critical.

School of Computational Science and Engineering (CSE) Associate Professor B. Aditya Prakash is leading a collaborative effort with researchers from Georgia Institute of Technology, University of Oklahoma, University of Iowa, and University of Virginia to determine the state of an infrastructure network during such a disruption. Prakash’s group has also been collaborating closely with the Oak Ridge National Laboratory on such problems in critical infrastructure networks.

However, according to Prakash, quickly determining which infrastructure components are damaged in the event of a disaster is not easily done after a disruption.

“If there is a disruption caused by an earthquake or hurricane and some things go down in the power grid, critical infrastructure system, transportation network, or the energy distribution network, how do you figure out what things have failed?” asked Prakash.

“The big problem in figuring out what has gone wrong is that all of these networks are highly decentralized and spread out. Usually there will be no central command or ‘oracle’ that immediately knows perfectly what is out, what is on, what is fine, and what is not.”

Given these networks’ decentralized organization and sparse installation of real-time monitoring systems, only a partial observation of the network is typically available after a disaster.

By using connectivity queries to map network states,­ Prakash’s team outlines in their recent paper how to determine the damage of an entire network from the portion of observable and operational nodes.

The team aims to infer failed network components by examining two-node characteristics: The partial information available from reachable nodes and a small sample of point probes which are typically more practical to obtain in a failure.

Modeling their research on real utility network data gathered by the University of Oklahoma, Prakash’s team proposes using an information-theoretic formulation called the minimum description length (MDL) principle. This is the notion that the best way to describe any data is the shortest one. Hence the researchers try to find those failed components, particularly the critical ones affecting overall system performance, which contain enough information to effectively minimize the MDL cost.

Alexander Rodriguez, a CSE Ph.D. student and lead author, presented the findings of this research this week at the 2020 Neural Processing and Information Systems (NeurIPS) conference as part of the Workshop on Artificial Intelligence for Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Response.



tags: ,


Machine Learning Center at Georgia Tech

            AUAI is supported by:



Subscribe to AIhub newsletter on substack



Related posts :

Congratulations to the #IJCAI2026 award winners

  07 Aug 2026
The winners of three prestigious IJCAI awards for 2026 have been announced.

The Machine Ethics podcast: Safe and moral AI with Rebecca Raper

In this episode Ben chats with Rebecca about AI governance and guardrails, moral assurance, under-specification problems, lack of interdisciplinary work in robotics, and more.

CogTwin: A framework for adaptable digital twins

  05 Aug 2026
Find out more about work presented at IJCAI 2025 on Cognitive Digital Twins.

Forthcoming machine learning and AI seminars: August 2026 edition

  04 Aug 2026
A list of free-to-attend AI-related seminars that are scheduled to take place in the next couple of months.

Healthcare benchmarks are only as good as their assumptions

  03 Aug 2026
In healthcare settings where patients use LLMs as a medical assistant, LLM performance differs between evaluation and deployment.

Engineering Out Loud: S13E2 – Ethics in AI presentation

  31 Jul 2026
Hear from Oregon State University researchers Houssam Abbas and Alicia Patterson.

Humans trained to spot AI faces in the battle against deepfake fraud

Researchers trained people to spot AI-generated faces by drawing their attention to six perceptual qualities.
monthly digest

AIhub monthly digest: July 2026 – time-series anomaly detection, music generation, and RoboCup in action

  29 Jul 2026
Welcome to our monthly digest, where you can catch up with AI research, events and news from the month past.



AUAI is supported by:







Subscribe to AIhub newsletter on substack




 















©2026.05 - Association for the Understanding of Artificial Intelligence