ΑΙhub.org
 

New technologies in the justice system – a UK Justice and Home Affairs Committee report


by
31 March 2022



share this:

gavel and books
On 30 March 2022, the Justice and Home Affairs Committee published a report entitled Technology rules? The advent of new technologies in the justice system. In this document, the committee explores the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and other algorithmic tools in activities pertaining to the justice system in England and Wales.

The authors warn that the rate of development of these technologies is outpacing scrutiny and regulation. Chair of the Justice and Home Affairs Committee, Baroness Hamwee, said: “We welcome the advantages AI can bring to our justice system, but not if there is no adequate oversight. Humans must be the ultimate decision makers, knowing how to question the tools they are using and how to challenge their outcome.”

The report is available on the Committee’s webpage in both HTML and PDF formats. It is awaiting Government response, and, following this, will be debated in the House of Lords.

The report consists of the following sections:

  1. Introduction
  2. Legal and institutional frameworks
  3. Transparency
  4. Human-technology interactions
  5. Evaluation and oversight
  6. Summary of conclusions and recommendations

In the report, the Committee make a number of recommendations. We highlight some of these below:

  • The Government should establish a single national body to govern the use of new technologies for the application of the law. The new national body should be independent, established on a statutory basis, and have its own budget.
  • This new national body should systematically evaluate and certify technological solutions prior to their deployment.
  • The Government has endorsed principles of artificial intelligence and should outline proposals to establish these firmly in statute.
  • Full participation in the Algorithmic Transparency Standard collection should become mandatory, and its scope extended to become inclusive of all advanced algorithms used in the application of the law that have direct or indirect implications for individuals.
  • Appropriate research should be undertaken to determine how the use of predictive algorithms affects decision making, and under what circumstances meaningful human interaction is most likely.
  • Comprehensive impact assessments should be made mandatory for each occasion an advanced technological tool is implemented in a new context or for a new purpose. They should include considerations of bias, weaknesses of the specific technology and associated datasets, and consideration of the wider societal and equality impacts. Impact assessments should be regularly updated and open to public scrutiny.

Read the report in full

HTML version
PDF version




Lucy Smith is Senior Managing Editor for AIhub.
Lucy Smith is Senior Managing Editor for AIhub.




            AIhub is supported by:


Related posts :



Introducing the NASA Onboard Artificial Intelligence Research (OnAIR) platform: an interview with Evana Gizzi

  03 Jul 2025
Find out about the OnAIR platform, some of the particular challenges of deploying AI-based solutions in space, and how the tool has been used so far.

An interview with Nicolai Ommer: the RoboCupSoccer Small Size League

  01 Jul 2025
We caught up with Nicolai to find out more about the Small Size League, how the auto referees work, and how teams use AI.

Forthcoming machine learning and AI seminars: July 2025 edition

  30 Jun 2025
A list of free-to-attend AI-related seminars that are scheduled to take place between 1 July and 31 August 2025.
monthly digest

AIhub monthly digest: June 2025 – gearing up for RoboCup 2025, privacy-preserving models, and mitigating biases in LLMs

  26 Jun 2025
Welcome to our monthly digest, where you can catch up with AI research, events and news from the month past.

RoboCupRescue: an interview with Adam Jacoff

  25 Jun 2025
Find out what's new in the RoboCupRescue League this year.

Making optimal decisions without having all the cards in hand

Read about research which won an outstanding paper award at AAAI 2025.

Exploring counterfactuals in continuous-action reinforcement learning

  20 Jun 2025
Shuyang Dong writes about her work that will be presented at IJCAI 2025.

What is vibe coding? A computer scientist explains what it means to have AI write computer code − and what risks that can entail

  19 Jun 2025
Until recently, most computer code was written, at least originally, by human beings. But with the advent of GenAI, that has begun to change.



 

AIhub is supported by:






©2025.05 - Association for the Understanding of Artificial Intelligence


 












©2025.05 - Association for the Understanding of Artificial Intelligence