ΑΙhub.org
 

The TAILOR roadmap for trustworthy AI


by
21 October 2022



share this:

Fredrik Heintz sat on a couch“Legislation and standards must be based on knowledge. This is where we researchers can contribute, providing information about the current forefront of research, and making well-grounded decisions possible. It’s important that experts have the opportunity to influence questions of this type,” says Fredrik Heintz. Photo credit: Anna Nilsen

By Anders Törneholm

The place of artificial intelligence, AI, in our everyday life is increasing and many researchers believe that what we have seen so far is only the beginning. However, AI must be trustworthy in all situations. Linköping University is coordinating TAILOR, a EU project that has drawn up a research-based roadmap intended to guide research funding bodies and decision-makers towards the trustworthy AI of the future.

“The development of artificial intelligence is in its infancy. When we look back at what we are doing today in 50 years, we will find it pretty primitive. In other words, most of the field remains to be discovered. That’s why it’s important to lay the foundation of trustworthy AI now,” says Fredrik Heintz, professor of artificial intelligence at LiU, and coordinator of the TAILOR project.

TAILOR is one of six research networks set up by the EU to strengthen research capacity and develop the AI of the future. The foundation of trustworthy AI is being laid by TAILOR, by drawing up a framework, guidelines and a specification of the needs of the AI research community. “TAILOR” is an abbreviation of Foundations of Trustworthy AI – integrating, learning, optimisation and reasoning.

Three criteria

The roadmap now presented by TAILOR is the first step on the way to standardisation, where the idea is that decision-makers and research funding bodies can gain insight into what is required to develop trustworthy AI. Fredrik Heintz believes that it is a good idea to show that many research problems must be solved before this can be achieved.

The researchers have defined three criteria for trustworthy AI: it must conform to laws and regulations, it must satisfy several ethical principles, and its implementation it must be robust and safe. Fredrik Heintz points out that these criteria pose major challenges, in particular the implementation of the ethical principles.

“Take justice, for example. Does this mean an equal distribution of resources or that all actors receive the resources needed to bring them all to the same level? We are facing major long-term questions, and it will take time before they are answered. Remember – the definition of justice has been debated by philosophers and scholars for hundreds of years,” says Fredrik Heintz.

Human centered

The project will focus on large comprehensive research questions, and will attempt to find standards that all who work with AI can adopt. But Fredrik Heintz is convinced that we can only achieve this if basic research into AI is given priority.

“People often regard AI as a technology issue, but what’s really important is whether we gain societal benefit from it. If we are to obtain AI that can be trusted and that functions well in society, we must make sure that it is centred on people,” says Fredrik Heintz.

Many of the legal proposals written within the EU and its member states are written by legal specialists. But Fredrik Heintz believes that they lack expert knowledge within AI, which is a problem.

“Legislation and standards must be based on knowledge. This is where we researchers can contribute, providing information about the current forefront of research, and making well-grounded decisions possible. It’s important that experts have the opportunity to influence questions of this type,” says Fredrik Heintz.

The complete roadmap is available at: Strategic Research and Innovation Roadmap of trustworthy AI.




Linköping University

            AUAI is supported by:



Subscribe to AIhub newsletter on substack



Related posts :

AI dives into a sea of data, from plankton to pollution

  16 Sep 2026
“Faster and cheaper monitoring means problems like plankton decline, litter accumulation, oil spills and coral degradation can be picked up and acted on sooner."

Interview with Yash Saxena: how is external knowledge used in AI systems?

  15 Sep 2026
What happens to information from external sources as it moves through an AI system?

When AI art has no author: Study finds generated images often can’t be traced to training data

  14 Sep 2026
A new method for surgically removing training examples from a model reveals that as datasets grow, the link between what a model learns and what it produces dissolves.

AI in nature conservation: powerful tool or dangerous shortcut?

  11 Sep 2026
AI provides opportunity for future biodiversity conservation but introduces risks .

Improving the process for large-scale recommender systems: an interview with Haruka Kiyohara

  10 Sep 2026
Credit-assigned policy gradient for early stage retrieval in two-stage ranking.

The Machine Ethics podcast: Data Collective with E.M. Lewis-Jong

Ben chats to E.M. Lewis-Jong about the promise of AI and making human connection easier, speech recognition and supporting linguistic diversity, making useful technologies that have a purpose, and more.

AI for ethology: an interview with Isla Duporge

  08 Sep 2026
Deep learning is becoming a powerful tool for understanding animal behaviour and tracking populations.

AI in cardiology: The path to practical application carries risks

  07 Sep 2026
Can artificial intelligence help us better combat cardiovascular diseases? Legal researcher Hannah van Kolfschooten urges caution, as there are still many legal issues that need to be resolved.



AUAI is supported by:







Subscribe to AIhub newsletter on substack




 















©2026.05 - Association for the Understanding of Artificial Intelligence