ΑΙhub.org
 

The TAILOR roadmap for trustworthy AI


by
21 October 2022



share this:

Fredrik Heintz sat on a couch“Legislation and standards must be based on knowledge. This is where we researchers can contribute, providing information about the current forefront of research, and making well-grounded decisions possible. It’s important that experts have the opportunity to influence questions of this type,” says Fredrik Heintz. Photo credit: Anna Nilsen

By Anders Törneholm

The place of artificial intelligence, AI, in our everyday life is increasing and many researchers believe that what we have seen so far is only the beginning. However, AI must be trustworthy in all situations. Linköping University is coordinating TAILOR, a EU project that has drawn up a research-based roadmap intended to guide research funding bodies and decision-makers towards the trustworthy AI of the future.

“The development of artificial intelligence is in its infancy. When we look back at what we are doing today in 50 years, we will find it pretty primitive. In other words, most of the field remains to be discovered. That’s why it’s important to lay the foundation of trustworthy AI now,” says Fredrik Heintz, professor of artificial intelligence at LiU, and coordinator of the TAILOR project.

TAILOR is one of six research networks set up by the EU to strengthen research capacity and develop the AI of the future. The foundation of trustworthy AI is being laid by TAILOR, by drawing up a framework, guidelines and a specification of the needs of the AI research community. “TAILOR” is an abbreviation of Foundations of Trustworthy AI – integrating, learning, optimisation and reasoning.

Three criteria

The roadmap now presented by TAILOR is the first step on the way to standardisation, where the idea is that decision-makers and research funding bodies can gain insight into what is required to develop trustworthy AI. Fredrik Heintz believes that it is a good idea to show that many research problems must be solved before this can be achieved.

The researchers have defined three criteria for trustworthy AI: it must conform to laws and regulations, it must satisfy several ethical principles, and its implementation it must be robust and safe. Fredrik Heintz points out that these criteria pose major challenges, in particular the implementation of the ethical principles.

“Take justice, for example. Does this mean an equal distribution of resources or that all actors receive the resources needed to bring them all to the same level? We are facing major long-term questions, and it will take time before they are answered. Remember – the definition of justice has been debated by philosophers and scholars for hundreds of years,” says Fredrik Heintz.

Human centered

The project will focus on large comprehensive research questions, and will attempt to find standards that all who work with AI can adopt. But Fredrik Heintz is convinced that we can only achieve this if basic research into AI is given priority.

“People often regard AI as a technology issue, but what’s really important is whether we gain societal benefit from it. If we are to obtain AI that can be trusted and that functions well in society, we must make sure that it is centred on people,” says Fredrik Heintz.

Many of the legal proposals written within the EU and its member states are written by legal specialists. But Fredrik Heintz believes that they lack expert knowledge within AI, which is a problem.

“Legislation and standards must be based on knowledge. This is where we researchers can contribute, providing information about the current forefront of research, and making well-grounded decisions possible. It’s important that experts have the opportunity to influence questions of this type,” says Fredrik Heintz.

The complete roadmap is available at: Strategic Research and Innovation Roadmap of trustworthy AI.




Linköping University




            AIhub is supported by:



Related posts :



Identifying patterns in insect scents using machine learning

  19 Dec 2025
Scientists will use machine learning to predict what types of molecules interact with insect olfactory receptors.

2025 AAAI / ACM SIGAI Doctoral Consortium interviews compilation

  18 Dec 2025
We collate our interviews with the 2025 cohort of doctoral consortium participants.

A backlash against AI imagery in ads may have begun as brands promote ‘human-made’

  17 Dec 2025
In a wave of new ads, brands like Heineken, Polaroid and Cadbury have started celebrating their work as “human-made”.

AIhub blog post highlights 2025

  16 Dec 2025
As the year draws to a close, we take a look back at some of our favourite blog posts.

Using machine learning to track greenhouse gas emissions

  15 Dec 2025
PhD candidate Julia Wąsala searches for greenhouse gas emissions in satellite data.

AAAI 2025 presidential panel on the future of AI research – video discussion on AGI

  12 Dec 2025
Watch the first in a series of video discussions from AAAI.

The Machine Ethics podcast: the AI bubble with Tim El-Sheikh

Ben chats to Tim about AI use cases, whether GenAI is even safe, the AI bubble, replacing human workers, data oligarchies and more.

Australia’s vast savannas are changing, and AI is showing us how

Improving decision-making for dynamic and rapidly changing environments.



 

AIhub is supported by:






 












©2025.05 - Association for the Understanding of Artificial Intelligence