ΑΙhub.org
 

AI transparency in practice: a report

by
22 March 2023



share this:

Abstract microscopic photography of a Graphics Processing Unit resembling a satellite image of a big cityFritzchens Fritz / Better Images of AI / GPU shot etched 5 / Licenced by CC-BY 4.0

A report, co-authored by Ramak Molavi Vasse’i (Mozilla’s Insights Team) and Jesse McCrosky (Thoughtworks), investigates the issue of AI transparency. The pair dig into what AI transparency actually means, and aim to provide useful and actionable information for specific stakeholders. The report also details a survey of current approaches, assesses their limitations, and outlines how meaningful transparency might be achieved.

The authors have highlighted the following key findings from their report:

  • The focus of builders is primarily on system accuracy and debugging, rather than helping end users and impacted people understand algorithmic decisions.
  • AI transparency is rarely prioritized by the leadership of respondents’ organizations, partly due to a lack of pressure to comply with the legislation.
  • While there is active research around AI explainability (XAI) tools, there are fewer examples of effective deployment and use of such tools, and little confidence in their effectiveness.
  • Apart from information on data bias, there is little work on sharing information on system design, metrics, or wider impacts on individuals and society. Builders generally do not employ criteria established for social and environmental transparency, nor do they consider unintended consequences.
  • Providing appropriate explanations to various stakeholders poses a challenge for developers. There is a noticeable discrepancy between the information survey respondents currently provide and the information they would find useful and recommend.

Topics covered in the report include:

  • Meaningful AI transparency
  • Transparency stakeholders and their needs
  • Motivations and priorities of builders around AI transparency
  • Transparency tools and methods
  • Awareness of social and ecological impact
  • Transparency delivery – practices and recommendations
  • Ranking challenges for greater AI transparency

You can read the report in full here. A PDF version is here.




Lucy Smith , Managing Editor for AIhub.
Lucy Smith , Managing Editor for AIhub.




            AIhub is supported by:


Related posts :



Are emergent abilities of large language models a mirage? – Interview with Brando Miranda

We hear about work that won a NeurIPS 2023 outstanding paper award.
25 April 2024, by

We built an AI tool to help set priorities for conservation in Madagascar: what we found

Daniele Silvestro has developed a tool that can help identify conservation and restoration priorities.
24 April 2024, by

Interview with Mike Lee: Communicating AI decision-making through demonstrations

We hear from AAAI/SIGAI Doctoral Consortium participant Mike Lee about his research on explainable AI.
23 April 2024, by

Machine learning viability modelling of vertical-axis wind turbines

Researchers have used a genetic learning algorithm to identify optimal pitch profiles for the turbine blades.
22 April 2024, by

The Machine Ethics podcast: What is AI? Volume 3

This is a bonus episode looking back over answers to our question: What is AI?
19 April 2024, by

DataLike: Interview with Tẹjúmádé Àfọ̀njá

"I place an emphasis on wellness and meticulously plan my schedule to ensure I can make meaningful contributions to what's important to me."




AIhub is supported by:






©2024 - Association for the Understanding of Artificial Intelligence


 












©2021 - ROBOTS Association