ΑΙhub.org
 

Writing with AI help can shift your opinions


by
23 May 2023



share this:
desk with laptop and notepad

By Patricia Waldron

Artificial intelligence-powered writing assistants that autocomplete sentences or offer “smart replies” not only put words into people’s mouths, they also put ideas into their heads, according to new research.

Maurice Jakesch, a doctoral student in the field of information science asked more than 1,500 participants to write a paragraph answering the question, “Is social media good for society?” People who used an AI writing assistant that was biased for or against social media were twice as likely to write a paragraph agreeing with the assistant, and significantly more likely to say they held the same opinion, compared with people who wrote without AI’s help.

The study suggests that the biases baked into AI writing tools – whether intentional or unintentional – could have concerning repercussions for culture and politics, researchers said.

“We’re rushing to implement these AI models in all walks of life, but we need to better understand the implications,” said co-author Mor Naaman, professor at the Jacobs Technion-Cornell Institute at Cornell Tech and of information science in the Cornell Ann S. Bowers College of Computing and Information Science. “Apart from increasing efficiency and creativity, there could be other consequences for individuals and also for our society – shifts in language and opinions.”

While others have looked at how large language models such as ChatGPT can create persuasive ads and political messages, this is the first study to show that the process of writing with an AI-powered tool can sway a person’s opinions. Jakesch presented the study, Co-Writing with Opinionated Language Models Affects Users’ Views, at the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems in April, where the paper received an honorable mention.

To understand how people interact with AI writing assistants, Jakesch steered a large language model to have either positive or negative opinions of social media. Participants wrote their paragraphs – either alone or with one of the opinionated assistants – on a platform he built that mimics a social media website. The platform collects data from participants as they type, such as which of the AI suggestions they accept and how long they take to compose the paragraph.

People who co-wrote with the pro-social media AI assistant composed more sentences arguing that social media is good, and vice versa, compared to participants without a writing assistant, as determined by independent judges. These participants also were more likely to profess their assistant’s opinion in a follow-up survey.

The researchers explored the possibility that people were simply accepting the AI suggestions to complete the task quicker. But even participants who took several minutes to compose their paragraphs came up with heavily influenced statements. The survey revealed that a majority of the participants did not even notice the AI was biased and didn’t realize they were being influenced.

“The process of co-writing doesn’t really feel like I’m being persuaded,” said Naaman. “It feels like I’m doing something very natural and organic – I’m expressing my own thoughts with some aid.”

When repeating the experiment with a different topic, the research team again saw that participants were swayed by the assistants. Now, the team is looking into how this experience creates the shift, and how long the effects last.

Just as social media has changed the political landscape by facilitating the spread of misinformation and the formation of echo chambers, biased AI writing tools could produce similar shifts in opinion, depending on which tools users choose. For example, some organizations have announced they plan to develop an alternative to ChatGPT, designed to express more conservative viewpoints.

These technologies deserve more public discussion regarding how they could be misused and how they should be monitored and regulated, the researchers said.

“The more powerful these technologies become and the more deeply we embed them in the social fabric of our societies,” Jakesch said, “the more careful we might want to be about how we’re governing the values, priorities and opinions built into them.”

Advait Bhat from Microsoft Research, Daniel Buschek of the University of Bayreuth and Lior Zalmanson of Tel Aviv University contributed to the paper.

Support for the work came from the National Science Foundation, the German National Academic Foundation and the Bavarian State Ministry of Science and the Arts.

Read the research in full

Co-Writing with Opinionated Language Models Affects Users’ Views, Maurice Jakesch, Advait Bhat, Daniel Buschek, Lior Zalmanson & Mor Naaman, Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.




Cornell University




            AIhub is supported by:



Related posts :



Interview with Janice Anta Zebaze: using AI to address energy supply challenges

  07 Oct 2025
Find out more about research combining renewable energy systems, tribology, and artificial intelligence.

How does AI affect how we learn? A cognitive psychologist explains why you learn when the work is hard

  06 Oct 2025
Early research is only beginning to scratch the surface of how AI technology will truly affect learning and cognition in the long run.

Interview with Zahra Ghorrati: developing frameworks for human activity recognition using wearable sensors

  03 Oct 2025
Find out more about research developing scalable and adaptive deep learning frameworks.

Diffusion beats autoregressive in data-constrained settings

  03 Oct 2025
How can we trade off more compute for less data?

Forthcoming machine learning and AI seminars: October 2025 edition

  02 Oct 2025
A list of free-to-attend AI-related seminars that are scheduled to take place between 3 October and 30 November 2025.
monthly digest

AIhub monthly digest: September 2025 – conference reviewing, soccer ball detection, and memory traces

  30 Sep 2025
Welcome to our monthly digest, where you can catch up with AI research, events and news from the month past.

Botanical time machines: AI is unlocking a treasure trove of data held in herbarium collections

  29 Sep 2025
New research describes the development and testing of a new AI-driven tool.

All creatures, great, small, and artificial

  26 Sep 2025
AI in Veterinary Medicine and what it can teach us about the data revolution.



 

AIhub is supported by:






 












©2025.05 - Association for the Understanding of Artificial Intelligence