ΑΙhub.org
 

Mapping phase diagrams with generative classifiers


by
05 June 2024



share this:

By Oliver Morsch

A research team led by Professor Christoph Bruder at the University of Basel, together with colleagues at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), have developed a new method for calculating phase diagrams of physical systems.

Phase diagrams are difficult to calculate

Phase diagrams are fundamental in physics. They describe the states in which a material can exist—water, for instance, can be found as ice, liquid, or vapor. Between these phases, phase transitions occur depending on specific quantities such as temperature or pressure. These transitions come in different kinds—for instance, they occur between a regular electric conductor and a superconductor or from a non-magnetic to a ferromagnetic state.

“However, calculating phase diagrams is difficult and requires a lot of prior knowledge and intuition on the part of the researchers,” says Julian Arnold, a PhD student in Bruder’s group. The problem is that a solid or a liquid consists of very many particles – atoms or molecules. These particles interact, meaning that they attract or repel each other; they form what is known as a many-body system. There are many possibilities for what the overall state of the material – characterized by the positions of the particles, but also additional properties, such as the orientation of the spins, which indicate the direction of magnetization – can look like.

“In the past, phase diagrams were often calculated by classifying these states with the help of neural networks,” Bruder explains. This works roughly like image recognition, where an algorithm tries to distinguish between images of cats and dogs. In this case, the algorithm calculates the likelihood that a particular image shows a cat or a dog and decides accordingly.

Faster thanks to generative models

As an alternative to this discriminative approach, the researchers in Basel and Boston have now developed a generative method. The difference is that in the generative method, which is similar to ChatGPT, the computer creates a large number of possible states of the system (in the above example, lots of cats and dogs) and decides which phase a particular state belongs to.

“We have shown that the generative method can calculate a phase diagram autonomously and in a much shorter time than the discriminative method”, says Arnold. Currently, he is testing the method on a model for black holes in the universe to detect their phase transitions. In the future, the new technique might even automatize physics laboratories: the algorithm would automatically set the control parameters of an experimental apparatus and immediately calculate a phase diagram from measured data.

Interestingly, the method for calculating phase diagrams inspired by ChatGPT can also be applied to models like ChatGPT itself. “ChatGPT also has something like a temperature,” Arnold explains. If this temperature is very low, the algorithm is not very creative and only produces expected results. If, on the other hand, it is too high, then the generated text becomes arbitrary and chaotic. Using the technique of the Basel researchers, one can determine the transition between these two phases and, based on that information, optimally tune language models.

Reference

Mapping Out Phase Diagrams with Generative Classifiers, Julian Arnold, Frank Schäfer, Alan Edelman, and Christoph Bruder, Physical Review Letters, 2024 | arXiv version.




University of Basel




            AIhub is supported by:


Related posts :



Interview with Joseph Marvin Imperial: aligning generative AI with technical standards

  02 Apr 2025
Joseph tells us about his PhD research so far and his experience at the AAAI 2025 Doctoral Consortium.

Forthcoming machine learning and AI seminars: April 2025 edition

  01 Apr 2025
A list of free-to-attend AI-related seminars that are scheduled to take place between 1 April and 31 May 2025.

AI can be a powerful tool for scientists. But it can also fuel research misconduct

  31 Mar 2025
While AI is allowing scientists to make technological breakthroughs, there’s also a darker side to the use of AI in science: scientific misconduct is on the rise.
monthly digest

AIhub monthly digest: March 2025 – human-allied AI, differential privacy, and social media microtargeting

  28 Mar 2025
Welcome to our monthly digest, where you can catch up with AI research, events and news from the month past.

AI ring tracks spelled words in American Sign Language

  27 Mar 2025
In its current form, SpellRing could be used to enter text into computers or smartphones via fingerspelling.

How AI images are ‘flattening’ Indigenous cultures – creating a new form of tech colonialism

  26 Mar 2025
AI-generated stock images that claim to depict “Indigenous Australians”, don’t resemble Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.

Interview with Lea Demelius: Researching differential privacy

  25 Mar 2025
We hear from doctoral consortium participant Lea Demelius who is investigating the trade-offs and synergies that arise between various requirements for trustworthy AI.

The Machine Ethics podcast: Careful technology with Rachel Coldicutt

This episode, Ben chats to Rachel Coldicutt about AI taxonomy, innovating for everyone not just the few, responsibilities of researchers, and more.




AIhub is supported by:






©2024 - Association for the Understanding of Artificial Intelligence


 












©2021 - ROBOTS Association