ΑΙhub.org
 

Predicting properties of complex metamaterials


by
08 November 2022



share this:

two mechanical metamaterialsTwo combinatorial mechanical metamaterials designed in such a way that the letters M and L bulge out in the front when being squeezed between two plates (top and bottom). Designing novel metamaterials such as this can be aided by machine learning. Image: Daan Haver and Yao Du.

Given a 3D piece of origami, can you flatten it without damaging it? Just by looking at the design, the answer is hard to predict, because each and every fold in the design has to be compatible with flattening. This is an example of a combinatorial problem. New research led by the University of Amsterdam Institute of Physics and research institute AMOLF has demonstrated that machine learning algorithms can accurately and efficiently answer these kinds of questions. This is expected to give a boost to the artificial intelligence-assisted design of complex and functional (meta)materials.

Artificial materials

These are engineered materials whose properties are determined by their geometrical structure rather than their chemical composition. A piece of origami is also a type of metamaterial, whose ability to flatten (a physically well-defined property) is determined by how it is folded (its structure), rather than by the type of paper it is made of. More generally, smart design allows us to control precisely where or how a metamaterial will bend, buckle or bulge, which may be used for all sorts of things, from shock absorbers to unfolding solar panels on a satellite in space.

A typical combinatorial metamaterial studied in the lab is built up of two or more types or orientations of building blocks, which deform in distinct ways when a mechanical force is applied. If these building blocks are combined randomly, the material as a whole will usually not buckle under pressure because not all blocks will be able to deform the way they want to; they will jam. Where one building block wishes to bulge outward, its neighbour should be able to squish inward. For the metamaterial to easily buckle, all deformed building blocks need to fit together like a jigsaw puzzle. Just like changing a single fold can make a piece of origami unflattenable, changing a single block can make a “floppy” metamaterial rigid.

Hard to predict

While metamaterials have many potential applications, designing a new one is challenging. Starting with a particular set of building blocks, deducing the overall metamaterial properties for different structures often boils down to trial and error. In this day and age, we do not want to do all of this by hand. However, because the properties of combinatorial metamaterials are so sensitive to changes to individual building blocks, conventional statistical and numerical methods are slow and prone to mistakes.

Instead, the researchers found that machine learning may be the answer: even when given only a relatively small set of examples to learn from, convolutional neural networks are able to accurately predict the metamaterial properties of any configuration of building blocks down to the finest detail.

“This far exceeded our expectations,” says PhD student and first author Ryan van Mastrigt. “The accuracy of the predictions shows us that the neural networks have actually learned the mathematical rules underlying the metamaterial properties, even when we don’t know all the rules ourselves.”

This finding suggests that we can use AI to design new complex metamaterials with useful properties. More broadly, applying neural networks to combinatorial problems allows us to pose many exciting questions. Perhaps they can aid us in solving (combinatorial) problems in other contexts. And conversely, the findings can improve our understanding of neural networks themselves, by for instance demonstrating how the complexity of a neural network relates to the complexity of the problems it can solve.

Read the research in full

Machine Learning of Implicit Combinatorial Rules in Mechanical Metamaterials, Ryan van Mastrigt, Marjolein Dijkstra, Martin van Hecke, and Corentin Coulais.
Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 (2022)198003.




University of Amsterdam

            AUAI is supported by:



Subscribe to AIhub newsletter on substack



Related posts :

AI listens in to help protect wildlife

  24 Jul 2026
Scientists are using AI systems to help track species and spot ecosystem changes.

How can we characterize consensus in a network of agents?

  23 Jul 2026
Belief Flow Networks give a logic-based way to ask not only whether connected agents will eventually agree on a shared "belief", but which final shared beliefs can emerge.

Anyone can fake a scientific image with AI, tricking even academic journals – and undermining trust in science

  22 Jul 2026
The proliferation of AI-generated science images in public spaces is not simply a misinformation problem.

AAAI presidential panel – AI and scientific integrity

  21 Jul 2026
Watch the next panel discussion in this series from AAAI.

Congratulations to the #ICML2026 award winners

  20 Jul 2026
Find out which articles have won the outstanding paper, outstanding position paper, and the test-of-time awards.

Interactive world simulator for robot policy training and evaluation

  17 Jul 2026
Yixuan Wang discusses his faithful world simulator that allows robots to learn how to push, pick up, and grasp objects.

#ICML2026 social media round-up

  17 Jul 2026
We take a look at what the participants got up to in Seoul.

François Pachet on music generation with AI

  16 Jul 2026
“The day I hear a song of the quality of the Beatles, I will say: ‘Okay, we are done’. And I’ve never heard anything like that. Never.”



AUAI is supported by:







Subscribe to AIhub newsletter on substack




 















©2026.05 - Association for the Understanding of Artificial Intelligence