ΑΙhub.org
 

AI transparency in practice: a report

by
22 March 2023



share this:

Abstract microscopic photography of a Graphics Processing Unit resembling a satellite image of a big cityFritzchens Fritz / Better Images of AI / GPU shot etched 5 / Licenced by CC-BY 4.0

A report, co-authored by Ramak Molavi Vasse’i (Mozilla’s Insights Team) and Jesse McCrosky (Thoughtworks), investigates the issue of AI transparency. The pair dig into what AI transparency actually means, and aim to provide useful and actionable information for specific stakeholders. The report also details a survey of current approaches, assesses their limitations, and outlines how meaningful transparency might be achieved.

The authors have highlighted the following key findings from their report:

  • The focus of builders is primarily on system accuracy and debugging, rather than helping end users and impacted people understand algorithmic decisions.
  • AI transparency is rarely prioritized by the leadership of respondents’ organizations, partly due to a lack of pressure to comply with the legislation.
  • While there is active research around AI explainability (XAI) tools, there are fewer examples of effective deployment and use of such tools, and little confidence in their effectiveness.
  • Apart from information on data bias, there is little work on sharing information on system design, metrics, or wider impacts on individuals and society. Builders generally do not employ criteria established for social and environmental transparency, nor do they consider unintended consequences.
  • Providing appropriate explanations to various stakeholders poses a challenge for developers. There is a noticeable discrepancy between the information survey respondents currently provide and the information they would find useful and recommend.

Topics covered in the report include:

  • Meaningful AI transparency
  • Transparency stakeholders and their needs
  • Motivations and priorities of builders around AI transparency
  • Transparency tools and methods
  • Awareness of social and ecological impact
  • Transparency delivery – practices and recommendations
  • Ranking challenges for greater AI transparency

You can read the report in full here. A PDF version is here.




Lucy Smith , Managing Editor for AIhub.
Lucy Smith , Managing Editor for AIhub.




            AIhub is supported by:


Related posts :



DataLike: Interview with Motunrayo Kilanko

Ndane and Isabella talk to Motunrayo Kilanko about learning on the job, projects, and apprenticeships.

Interview with Salena Torres Ashton: causality and natural language

We spoke to Salena about her research, the AAAI experience, and her career path from professional genealogist and historian to machine learning PhD student.
02 May 2024, by

5 questions schools and universities should ask before they purchase AI tech products

Every few years, an emerging technology shows up at the doorstep of schools and universities promising to transform education.
01 May 2024, by

AIhub monthly digest: April 2024 – explainable AI, access to compute, and noughts and crosses

Welcome to our monthly digest, where you can catch up with AI research, events and news from the month past.
30 April 2024, by

The Machine Ethics podcast: Good tech with Eleanor Drage and Kerry McInerney

In this episode, Ben chats Eleanor Drage and Kerry McInerney about good tech.
29 April 2024, by

AIhub coffee corner: Open vs closed science

The AIhub coffee corner captures the musings of AI experts over a short conversation.
26 April 2024, by




AIhub is supported by:






©2024 - Association for the Understanding of Artificial Intelligence


 












©2021 - ROBOTS Association