ΑΙhub.org
 

ACM statement on facial recognition technology


by
01 July 2020



share this:
ACM logo

The Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) U.S. Technology Policy Committee (USTPC) released a statement on 30 June calling for “an immediate suspension of the current and future private and governmental use of FR [facial recognition] technologies in all circumstances known or reasonably foreseeable to be prejudicial to established human and legal rights.”

In the document, the ACM write:

The Committee concludes that, when rigorously evaluated, the technology too often produces results demonstrating clear bias based on ethnic, racial, gender, and other human characteristics recognizable by computer systems. The consequences of such bias, USTPC notes, frequently can and do extend well beyond inconvenience to profound injury, particularly to the lives, livelihoods and fundamental rights of individuals in specific demographic groups, including some of the most vulnerable populations in our society.

Such bias and its effects are scientifically and socially unacceptable.

The USTPC find that, at present, facial recognition technology is not sufficiently mature and reliable to be used fairly and safely. Systems have been adopted by governments and industry before the necessary regulation and guiding principles have been put in place.

Therefore, the USTPC call for urgent development of standards and regulation and provide a list of guiding principles in the document. These cover the areas of accuracy, transparency, governance, risk management and accountability. Their recommendations include:

  • Before a facial recognition system is used to make or support decisions that can seriously adversely affect the human and legal rights of individuals, the magnitude and effects of such system’s initial and dynamic biases and inaccuracies must be fully understood.
  • When error rates are reported, they must be disaggregated by sex, race, and other context-dependent demographic features, as appropriate.
  • A facial recognition system should be activated only after some form of meaningful advance public notice of the intention to deploy it is provided and, once activated, ongoing public notice that it is in use should be provided at the point of use or online, as practicable and contextually appropriate. These notices should contain a description of the training data and details about the algorithm.
  • No facial recognition system should be deployed prior to establishing appropriate policies governing its use and the management of data collected by the system.
  • No facial recognition system should be made available or deployed unless its relevant material risks to vulnerable populations, or to society as a whole, can be sufficiently eliminated or remediated.
  • When harm results from the use of such systems, the organization, institution, or agency responsible for its deployment must be fully accountable under law for all resulting external risks and harms.

You can see the full list of recommendations and read the ACM USTPC statement in full here.




AIhub is dedicated to free high-quality information about AI.
AIhub is dedicated to free high-quality information about AI.

            AUAI is supported by:



Subscribe to AIhub newsletter on substack



Related posts :

monthly digest

AIhub monthly digest: October 2026 – neurosymbolic planning, time-series forecasting, and robots for the home

  30 Oct 2026
Welcome to our monthly digest, where you can catch up with AI research, events and news from the month past.
AI pioneers

From teaching machines to teaching people: an interview with Michael Littman

  29 Oct 2026
AI Pioneer Michael Littman reflects on the evolution of reinforcement learning, the power of science communication, and how generative AI is changing the way we teach and learn.

From lab to life: Why translating AI advances to the real world is a major challenge

  28 Oct 2026
Systems that perform well in controlled lab settings often fall short when deployed in homes, in hospitals or on city streets.

Researchers get AI ‘drunk’ to expose new cyber security risks in chatbots

Fine-tuning large language models using drunken text makes them more likely to leak secrets and answer harmful questions.

AI is creating jobs as well as erasing them – but how rewarding are they?

  26 Oct 2026
One area of increased employment is in people “cleaning up” after LLMs, or quality controlling them.

How AI changes human decision-making

  23 Oct 2026
AI can identify patterns that people miss and bring new information into decision-making. However, this does not automatically lead to better decisions.

Competing in RoboCup@Home and winning the 2026 best paper award: an interview with Raphael Memmesheimer

  22 Oct 2026
Hear more about Raphael's research and his involvement in the RoboCup@Home league.

AI is distorting archaeology and flattening Indigenous Knowledge

While AI can help archaeologists, it can also spread pseudoscientific claims and false histories, stripping Indigenous Knowledge of context, consent and community control.


↑


AUAI is supported by:







Subscribe to AIhub newsletter on substack




 















©2026.05 - Association for the Understanding of Artificial Intelligence