ΑΙhub.org
 

ACM statement on facial recognition technology


by
01 July 2020



share this:
ACM logo

The Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) U.S. Technology Policy Committee (USTPC) released a statement on 30 June calling for “an immediate suspension of the current and future private and governmental use of FR [facial recognition] technologies in all circumstances known or reasonably foreseeable to be prejudicial to established human and legal rights.”

In the document, the ACM write:

The Committee concludes that, when rigorously evaluated, the technology too often produces results demonstrating clear bias based on ethnic, racial, gender, and other human characteristics recognizable by computer systems. The consequences of such bias, USTPC notes, frequently can and do extend well beyond inconvenience to profound injury, particularly to the lives, livelihoods and fundamental rights of individuals in specific demographic groups, including some of the most vulnerable populations in our society.

Such bias and its effects are scientifically and socially unacceptable.

The USTPC find that, at present, facial recognition technology is not sufficiently mature and reliable to be used fairly and safely. Systems have been adopted by governments and industry before the necessary regulation and guiding principles have been put in place.

Therefore, the USTPC call for urgent development of standards and regulation and provide a list of guiding principles in the document. These cover the areas of accuracy, transparency, governance, risk management and accountability. Their recommendations include:

  • Before a facial recognition system is used to make or support decisions that can seriously adversely affect the human and legal rights of individuals, the magnitude and effects of such system’s initial and dynamic biases and inaccuracies must be fully understood.
  • When error rates are reported, they must be disaggregated by sex, race, and other context-dependent demographic features, as appropriate.
  • A facial recognition system should be activated only after some form of meaningful advance public notice of the intention to deploy it is provided and, once activated, ongoing public notice that it is in use should be provided at the point of use or online, as practicable and contextually appropriate. These notices should contain a description of the training data and details about the algorithm.
  • No facial recognition system should be deployed prior to establishing appropriate policies governing its use and the management of data collected by the system.
  • No facial recognition system should be made available or deployed unless its relevant material risks to vulnerable populations, or to society as a whole, can be sufficiently eliminated or remediated.
  • When harm results from the use of such systems, the organization, institution, or agency responsible for its deployment must be fully accountable under law for all resulting external risks and harms.

You can see the full list of recommendations and read the ACM USTPC statement in full here.




AIhub is dedicated to free high-quality information about AI.
AIhub is dedicated to free high-quality information about AI.

            AUAI is supported by:



Subscribe to AIhub newsletter on substack



Related posts :

Tech-savvy STEM students prone to letting AI do their thinking for them

  13 Nov 2026
How can students break their dependence on AI tools?

An invisible word of the day: watermarking assignment prompts to detect copy-pasted chatbot answers

  12 Nov 2026
SteganoPrompt lets educators embed an invisible but openly announced instruction in an assignment prompt.

AI100 longitudinal study examines how AI has entered the mainstream

  10 Nov 2026
Published every five years, the report is compiled by experts in the field.
AI pioneers

Thinking big – from constraint programming to the Holy Grail: an interview with Gene Freuder

  10 Nov 2026
In our latest instalment of AI Pioneers, we speak to Gene Freuder on the field of constraint programming, neurosymbolic and generative AI approaches in AI, and the bigger picture of computer science.

How attackers persuade AI agents to break the rules

  09 Nov 2026
As AI assistants evolve into AI agents, a study has found that the biggest safety risks in their use may not come from single malicious prompts, but from carefully orchestrated conversations.

Interview with Minji Park: humans in the loop to keep language models up to date

  06 Nov 2026
Human-AI co-inference through a shared editable state.

AI plus chemistry can expand battery electrolyte design

  05 Nov 2026
Researchers are using artificial intelligence to speed the search for better battery materials.
coffee corner

AIhub coffee corner: Are humanoids the future of embodied AI?

  04 Nov 2026
The AIhub coffee corner captures the musings of AI experts over a short conversation.


↑


AUAI is supported by:







Subscribe to AIhub newsletter on substack




 















©2026.05 - Association for the Understanding of Artificial Intelligence