ΑΙhub.org
 

ACM statement on facial recognition technology


by
01 July 2020



share this:
ACM logo

The Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) U.S. Technology Policy Committee (USTPC) released a statement on 30 June calling for “an immediate suspension of the current and future private and governmental use of FR [facial recognition] technologies in all circumstances known or reasonably foreseeable to be prejudicial to established human and legal rights.”

In the document, the ACM write:

The Committee concludes that, when rigorously evaluated, the technology too often produces results demonstrating clear bias based on ethnic, racial, gender, and other human characteristics recognizable by computer systems. The consequences of such bias, USTPC notes, frequently can and do extend well beyond inconvenience to profound injury, particularly to the lives, livelihoods and fundamental rights of individuals in specific demographic groups, including some of the most vulnerable populations in our society.

Such bias and its effects are scientifically and socially unacceptable.

The USTPC find that, at present, facial recognition technology is not sufficiently mature and reliable to be used fairly and safely. Systems have been adopted by governments and industry before the necessary regulation and guiding principles have been put in place.

Therefore, the USTPC call for urgent development of standards and regulation and provide a list of guiding principles in the document. These cover the areas of accuracy, transparency, governance, risk management and accountability. Their recommendations include:

  • Before a facial recognition system is used to make or support decisions that can seriously adversely affect the human and legal rights of individuals, the magnitude and effects of such system’s initial and dynamic biases and inaccuracies must be fully understood.
  • When error rates are reported, they must be disaggregated by sex, race, and other context-dependent demographic features, as appropriate.
  • A facial recognition system should be activated only after some form of meaningful advance public notice of the intention to deploy it is provided and, once activated, ongoing public notice that it is in use should be provided at the point of use or online, as practicable and contextually appropriate. These notices should contain a description of the training data and details about the algorithm.
  • No facial recognition system should be deployed prior to establishing appropriate policies governing its use and the management of data collected by the system.
  • No facial recognition system should be made available or deployed unless its relevant material risks to vulnerable populations, or to society as a whole, can be sufficiently eliminated or remediated.
  • When harm results from the use of such systems, the organization, institution, or agency responsible for its deployment must be fully accountable under law for all resulting external risks and harms.

You can see the full list of recommendations and read the ACM USTPC statement in full here.




AIhub is dedicated to free high-quality information about AI.
AIhub is dedicated to free high-quality information about AI.

            AIhub is supported by:



Subscribe to AIhub newsletter on substack



Related posts :

A principled approach for data bias mitigation

  18 Mar 2026
Find out more about work presented at AIES 2025 which proposes a new way to measure data bias, along with a mitigation algorithm with mathematical guarantees.

An AI image generator for non-English speakers

  17 Mar 2026
"Translations lose the nuances of language and culture, because many words lack good English equivalents."

AI and Theory of Mind: an interview with Nitay Alon

  16 Mar 2026
Find out more about how Theory of Mind plays out in deceptive environments, multi-agents systems, the interdisciplinary nature of this field, when to use Theory of Mind, and when not to, and more.
coffee corner

AIhub coffee corner: AI, kids, and the future – “generation AI”

  13 Mar 2026
The AIhub coffee corner captures the musings of AI experts over a short conversation.

AI chatbots can effectively sway voters – in either direction

  12 Mar 2026
A short interaction with a chatbot can meaningfully shift a voter’s opinion about a presidential candidate or proposed policy.

Studying the properties of large language models: an interview with Maxime Meyer

  11 Mar 2026
What happens when you increase the prompt length in a LLM? In the latest interview in our AAAI Doctoral Consortium series, we sat down with Maxime, a PhD student in Singapore.

What the Moltbook experiment is teaching us about AI

An experimental social media platform where only AI bots can post reveals surprising lessons about artificial intelligence behaviour and safety.

The malleable mind: context accumulation drives LLM’s belief drift

  09 Mar 2026
LLMs change their "beliefs" over time, depending on the data they are given.



AIhub is supported by:







Subscribe to AIhub newsletter on substack




 















©2026.02 - Association for the Understanding of Artificial Intelligence