ΑΙhub.org
 

#RoboCup2019 Standard Platform League Competition Day 1


by
04 July 2019



share this:

Twenty teams are competing in the Standard Platform League (SPL) at RoboCup 2019 in Sydney this week. However, the experience and skills of the league’s teams vary greatly, from six-time champion B-Human to new teams from Russia and Colombia. Although teams have been onsite for two days preparing, today was the first day of competition.

SPQR versus Bembelbots at RoboCup 2019. (Photo by JT Genter)

Tournament Set-up

Due to skill and experience differences, the SPL utilizes a two-tiered competition structure with the Champions Cup for the strongest teams and the Challenge Shield for all other teams. Teams are initially seeded into the Champions Cup or Challenge Shield using the Glicko system based on all available results from previous official RoboCup tournaments.

However, after the first round robin phase, the worst-performing teams in the Champions Cup play the best performing teams in the Challenge Shield. These so-called Promotion Games allow the best Challenge Shield teams a chance to move to the Champions Cup — as well as provide the worst performing Champions Cup teams the chance to drop down to the Challenge Shield. So, regardless of original seeding, any team can win the Champions Cup.

You can read more about the tournament set-up in Section A.4 of the SPL rulebook.

UT Austin Villa versus rUNSWift at RoboCup 2019. (Photo by JT Genter)

Competition Day 1

Competition Day 1 in the SPL contains all of the first round robin games in the Champions Cup and Challenge Shield. As the SPL planned for a tournament of 24 teams before some teams needed to withdraw, the league expected to have four pools of three teams each in both the Champions Cup and Challenge Shield. But, as only twenty teams could come to Sydney, the SPL opted to run the Challenge Shield round robin as two pools of four teams each.

Competition Day 1 Schedule

Competition Day 1 Results

HULKs versus UPennalizers at RoboCup 2019. (Photo by JT Genter)

One advantage of the Champions Cup and Challenge Shield competition format is that teams are generally playing competitive games from the start. Even many of the games with moderate goal differences felt relatively close to both the teams and spectators.

As you can see, most of the groups played out as expected. But, there were some notable upsets. Berlin United (3rd Seed in Group C) defeated NTU RoboPAL (2nd Seed in Group C) 6 to 1, and only lost to Nao Devils Dortmund (1st Seed in Group C) by one.

New team SABANA Herons (4th Seed in Group E) was able to defeat MiPAL (3rd Seed in Group E) 4 to 0 to claim the 3rd place spot in the group.

New team Starkit (4th Seed in Group F) was able to defeat RoboEireann (3rd Seed in Group F) 5 to 1 to claim the 3rd place spot in the group.

Looking Toward Competition Day 2

Friday morning will see Promotion Games between eight teams. Four of these teams will advance to the Champions Cup to join B-Human, Berlin United, HULKs, Nao-Team HTWK, Nao Devils Dortmund, rUNSWift, TJArk and UT Austin Villa. Meanwhile, the losing teams from these games will join the Challenge Shield. The Promotion Games are as follows:

  • UPennalizers vs. NomadZ
  • Naova vs. SPQR
  • NTU RoboPAL vs. Bembelbots
  • Camellia Dragons vs. Dutch Nao Team

If you want to follow the SPL:



tags:


Katie Genter represents the SPL as a RoboCup Executive member.
Katie Genter represents the SPL as a RoboCup Executive member.

            AIhub is supported by:



Subscribe to AIhub newsletter on substack



Related posts :

The malleable mind: context accumulation drives LLM’s belief drift

  09 Mar 2026
LLMs change their "beliefs" over time, depending on the data they are given.

RWDS Big Questions: how do we balance innovation and regulation in the world of AI?

  06 Mar 2026
The panel explores the tensions, trade-offs and practical realities facing policymakers and data scientists alike.

Studying multiplicity: an interview with Prakhar Ganesh

  05 Mar 2026
What is multiplicity, and what implications does it have for fairness, privacy and interpretability in real-world systems?

Top AI ethics and policy issues of 2025 and what to expect in 2026

, and   04 Mar 2026
In the latest issue of AI Matters, a publication of ACM SIGAI, Larry Medsker summarised the year in AI ethics and policy, and looked ahead to 2026.

The greatest risk of AI in higher education isn’t cheating – it’s the erosion of learning itself

  03 Mar 2026
Will AI hollow out the pipeline of students, researchers and faculty that is the basis of today’s universities?

Forthcoming machine learning and AI seminars: March 2026 edition

  02 Mar 2026
A list of free-to-attend AI-related seminars that are scheduled to take place between 2 March and 30 April 2026.
monthly digest

AIhub monthly digest: February 2026 – collective decision making, multi-modal learning, and governing the rise of interactive AI

  27 Feb 2026
Welcome to our monthly digest, where you can catch up with AI research, events and news from the month past.

The Good Robot podcast: the role of designers in AI ethics with Tomasz Hollanek

  26 Feb 2026
In this episode, Tomasz argues that design is central to AI ethics and explores the role designers should play in shaping ethical AI systems.



AIhub is supported by:







Subscribe to AIhub newsletter on substack




 















©2026.02 - Association for the Understanding of Artificial Intelligence